Literature DB >> 19515586

Evaluation of attenuation-based tube current control in coronary artery calcium scoring on prospective ECG-triggered 64-detector CT.

Jun Horiguchi1, Noriaki Matsuura, Hideya Yamamoto, Toshiro Kitagawa, Kenichi Sato, Yasuki Kihara, Katsuhide Ito.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate image noise (standard deviation of computed tomographic value) and to assess variability in repeated coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on prospective electrocardiographically triggered 64-detctor computed tomography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 428) suspected of having coronary artery disease were scanned twice using three protocols: with tube current modified by body mass index (BMI; group A), by BMI and body height (group B), and by attenuation at the maximal heart diameter (group C). Image noise was plotted against BMI. Interscan variability of CAC scores was determined. The effective dose was estimated by computed tomographic dose index.
RESULTS: The mean effective dose and image noise, respectively, were 0.9 +/- 0.2 mSv (range, 0.6-1.5 mSv) and 19 +/- 4 Hounsfield units (HU) (range, 10-32 HU) for group A; 0.8 +/- 0.2 mSv (range, 0.5-1.4 mSv) and 18 +/- 4 HU (range, 10-31 HU) for group B; and 0.8 +/- 0.4 mSv (range, 0.3-2.2 mSv) and 20 +/- 2 HU (range, 16-26 HU) for group C. Group C used a wide dose range and controlled noise within a small range. The positive slopes of image noise versus BMI, 0.81 HU/(kg/m(2)) in group A and 0.62 HU/(kg/m(2)) in group B, suggested insufficient control of the tube current. In contrast, the nearly flat slope in group C, 0.091 HU/(kg/m(2)), indicated optimal control. The interscan variability for Agatston score, volume, and mass in patients with CAC (n = 300) was 13% (median, 8%), 12% (median, 7%), and 11% (median, 6%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CAC scoring on prospective electrocardiographically triggered 64-detector computed tomography using attenuation-based tube current control has the potential to favorably control image noise with low dose and low interscan variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515586     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

1.  Radiation dose threshold for coronary artery calcium score with MDCT: how low can you go?

Authors:  Tom D Newton; Hatem Mehrez; Kelly Wong; Ravi Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andrew Crean; Elsie Nguyen; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior-posterior chest diameter.

Authors:  Patrik Rogalla; Jörg Blobel; Sonja Kandel; Henning Meyer; Jürgen Mews; Christian Kloeters; Hany Kashani; Alexander Lembcke; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Image noise-based dose adaptation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: dose and image quality optimisation in comparison with BMI-based dose adaptation.

Authors:  Devang Odedra; Joerg Blobel; Saad Alhumayyd; Miranda Durand; Laura Jimenez-Juan; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Iterative reconstruction and individualized automatic tube current selection reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality in 320-multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  M C Williams; N W Weir; S Mirsadraee; F Millar; A Baird; F Minns; N G Uren; G McKillop; R K Bull; E J R van Beek; J H Reid; D E Newby
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.350

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.