Literature DB >> 19515404

Do women with pure stress urinary incontinence need urodynamics?

G Alessandro Digesu1, Caroline Hendricken, Ruwan Fernando, Vik Khullar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of performing urodynamic investigations in the assessment of women with a history of pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: Consecutive women with lower urinary tract symptoms were studied retrospectively. Urinary symptoms were determined from the frequency-volume chart and symptom section of the King's Health Questionnaire. Only women with pure SUI symptoms were included.
RESULTS: A total of 3428 women aged 24-81 years were studied. Only 308 women (8.9%) could be classified as having pure SUI from the questionnaire. Of these, 241 of women (78.2%) had urodynamic stress incontinence, 23 women (7.5%) had detrusor overactivity, 9 women (2.9%) had mixed urodynamic diagnosis, and 35 women (11.4%) had inconclusive urodynamics. Postvoid residual volumes greater than 100 mL were noted in 24 (7.8%) women.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that urodynamic investigations provide useful information in the assessment of women with a history of pure SUI, because as many as 20% of them might not need surgery as the first line of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515404     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

Review 1.  Do urodynamic parameters predict persistent postoperative stress incontinence after midurethral sling? A systematic review.

Authors:  Amie Kawasaki; Jennifer M Wu; Cindy L Amundsen; Alison C Weidner; John P Judd; Ethan M Balk; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Danielle Markle Price; Karen Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Linda Brubaker; Heather J Litman; Halina M Zyczynski; R Edward Varner; Cindy Amundsen; Larry T Sirls; Peggy A Norton; Amy M Arisco; Toby C Chai; Philippe Zimmern; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly J Dandreo; Shawn A Menefee; Kimberly Kenton; Jerry Lowder; Holly E Richter; Salil Khandwala; Ingrid Nygaard; Stephen R Kraus; Harry W Johnson; Gary E Lemack; Marina Mihova; Michael E Albo; Elizabeth Mueller; Gary Sutkin; Tracey S Wilson; Yvonne Hsu; Thomas A Rozanski; Leslie M Rickey; David Rahn; Sharon Tennstedt; John W Kusek; E Ann Gormley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Are multichannel urodynamics required prior to surgery in a woman with stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Arthur Mourtzinos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Role of urodynamics before prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Ilias Giarenis; Michele Meschia; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Urodynamic assessment of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sarah L Housley; Chris Harding; Robert Pickard
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

7.  The surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Christopher K Harding; A C Thorpe
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

8.  The value of urodynamic tools to guide patient selection in sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Jamie Drossaerts; Kevin Rademakers; Gommert van Koeveringe; Philip Van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Recent advances in urodynamics in women.

Authors:  Georgina Baines; Ana Sofia Da Silva; George Araklitis; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-06-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.