Literature DB >> 19515221

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is extremely elevated in polycystic liver disease.

Esmé Waanders1, Loes van Keimpema, Johannes T Brouwer, Martijn G H van Oijen, Raymond Aerts, Fred C G J Sweep, Frederik Nevens, Joost P H Drenth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is used as a biomarker to differentiate benign from malignant gastrointestinal disorders. We examined the value of CA19-9 measurement in polycystic livers after observing high CA19-9 cyst fluid levels in a benign polycystic liver case.
METHODS: We determined CA19-9 levels in serum (n=120) and hepatic cyst fluid (n=81), from patients with polycystic livers (n=109) and simple hepatic cysts (n=24). Further, we analysed CA19-9 expression in normal and polycystic liver tissue (n=17).
RESULTS: Cyst fluid CA19-9 levels from both polycystic livers and simple hepatic cysts were extremely high (median 91 000 U/ml, range 14-15 870 000 U/ml; median 85 000 U/ml, range 332-1 744 000 U/ml respectively). Serum CA19-9 levels were significantly higher in polycystic liver patients (median 30 U/ml, range 0-1200 U/ml) compared with patients with simple hepatic cysts (median 10 U/ml, range 3-200 U/ml, P=0.0011). Serum CA19-9 levels correlated with those in cyst fluid (r=0.3979, P=0.0399), polycystic liver volume (r=0.3870, P=0.0025) and the size of the largest cyst (simple cysts group; r=0.5319, P=0.0280). Cyst epithelia showed strong CA19-9 expression. Evacuation of cyst fluid in four patients resulted in a dramatic decrease in the serum CA19-9 levels (60-95%).
CONCLUSIONS: CA19-9 levels are high in the cyst fluid and serum of polycystic liver disease patients due to production and secretion by cyst epithelia. It does not reflect malignancy in these patients and may be of value as a biomarker for intervention efficiency assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515221     DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02055.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  22 in total

Review 1.  Medical therapy for polycystic liver disease.

Authors:  S Khan; A Dennison; G Garcea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification and treatment options for polycystic liver diseases.

Authors:  Bassam Abu-Wasel; Caolan Walsh; Valerie Keough; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A Case of Benign Hepatic Cyst with Supra-elevated Cyst Fluid Tumor Markers.

Authors:  Alexander Tonthat; Danvi Bui; Miriam Romero; Emily Lo; Gary Kanel; Takeshi Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Evaluation of hepatic cystic lesions.

Authors:  Marten A Lantinga; Tom J G Gevers; Joost P H Drenth
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Polycystic liver disease.

Authors:  Rodrigo Nazário Leão; Raquel Salustio; José Vaz Ribeiro
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-01-17

Review 6.  Isolated polycystic liver disease.

Authors:  Qi Qian
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of polycystic liver disease.

Authors:  Tom J G Gevers; Joost P H Drenth
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Intrahepatic biliary cystic neoplasms: Surgical results of 9 patients and literature review.

Authors:  Ali Emre; Kürşat Rahmi Serin; Ilgin Ozden; Yaman Tekant; Orhan Bilge; Aydın Alper; Mine Güllüoğlu; Koray Güven
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Renal transplantation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Nada Kanaan; Olivier Devuyst; Yves Pirson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 10.  Invasive biliary mucinous cystic neoplasm: a review.

Authors:  Kerri A Simo; Iain H Mckillop; William A Ahrens; John B Martinie; David A Iannitti; David Sindram
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.