Literature DB >> 19515098

Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds.

Elisângela L S Bezerra1, Isabel C Machado, Marco A R Mello.   

Abstract

1. In the Neotropics, most plants depend on animals for pollination. Solitary bees are the most important vectors, and among them members of the tribe Centridini depend on oil from flowers (mainly Malpighiaceae) to feed their larvae. This specialized relationship within 'the smallest of all worlds' (a whole pollination network) could result in a 'tiny world' different from the whole system. This 'tiny world' would have higher nestedness, shorter path lengths, lower modularity and higher resilience if compared with the whole pollination network. 2. In the present study, we contrasted a network of oil-flowers and their visitors from a Brazilian steppe ('caatinga') to whole pollination networks from all over the world. 3. A network approach was used to measure network structure and, finally, to test fragility. The oil-flower network studied was more nested (NODF = 0.84, N = 0.96) than all of the whole pollination networks studied. Average path lengths in the two-mode network were shorter (one node, both for bee and plant one-mode network projections) and modularity was lower (M = 0.22 and four modules) than in all of the whole pollination networks. Extinctions had no or small effects on the network structure, with an average change in nestedness smaller than 2% in most of the cases studied; and only two species caused coextinctions. The higher the degree of the removed species, the stronger the effect and the higher the probability of a decrease in nestedness. 4. We conclude that the oil-flower subweb is more cohesive and resilient than whole pollination networks. Therefore, the Malpighiaceae have a robust pollination service in the Neotropics. Our findings reinforce the hypothesis that each ecological service is in fact a mosaic of different subservices with a hierarchical structure ('webs within webs').

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515098     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01567.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  9 in total

1.  Cheaters in mutualism networks.

Authors:  Julieta Genini; L Patrícia C Morellato; Paulo R Guimarães; Jens M Olesen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat- and bird-fruit networks.

Authors:  Marco Aurelio Ribeiro Mello; Flávia Maria Darcie Marquitti; Paulo R Guimarães; Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko; Pedro Jordano; Marcus Aloizio Martinez de Aguiar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Buzz-Pollination in a Tropical Montane Cloud Forest: Compositional Similarity and Plant-Pollinator Interactions.

Authors:  Paola A González-Vanegas; Matthias Rös; José G García-Franco; Armando Aguirre-Jaimes
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  A Comparison of Social Bee-Plant Networks between Two Urban Areas.

Authors:  H G S Zotarelli; D M Evans; L R Bego; S H Sofia
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 1.434

5.  Improved community detection in weighted bipartite networks.

Authors:  Stephen J Beckett
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Does a Species' Extinction-Proneness Predict Its Contribution to Nestedness? A Test Using a Sunbird-Tree Visitation Network.

Authors:  Charles A Nsor; Hazel M Chapman; William Godsoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Species traits and interaction rules shape a species-rich seed-dispersal interaction network.

Authors:  Esther Sebastián-González; Mathias M Pires; Camila I Donatti; Paulo R Guimarães; Rodolfo Dirzo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Nestedness of ectoparasite-vertebrate host networks.

Authors:  Sean P Graham; Hassan K Hassan; Nathan D Burkett-Cadena; Craig Guyer; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Resilient networks of ant-plant mutualists in Amazonian forest fragments.

Authors:  Heather A Passmore; Emilio M Bruna; Sylvia M Heredia; Heraldo L Vasconcelos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.