Literature DB >> 19514851

Simplified system for absolute fracture risk assessment: clinical validation in Canadian women.

William D Leslie1, James F Tsang, Lisa M Lix.   

Abstract

Absolute 10-yr fracture risk based on multiple factors is the preferred method for risk assessment. A simplified risk assessment system from sex, age, DXA, and two clinical risk factors (CRFs)--prior fracture and systemic corticosteroid (CS) use--has been used in Canada since 2005. This study was undertaken to evaluate this system in the Canadian female population. A total of 16,205 women > or =50 yr of age at the time of baseline BMD (1998-2002) were identified in a database containing all clinical DXA test results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Basal 10-yr fracture risk from age and minimum T-score (lumbar spine, femur neck, trochanter, total hip) was categorized as low (<10%), moderate (10-20%), or high (>20%). Health service records since 1987 were assessed for prior fracture codes (N = 5224), recent major CS use (N = 616), and fracture codes after BMD testing (mean, 3.1 yr of follow-up) for the hip, vertebrae, forearm, or humerus (designated osteoporotic, N = 757). Fracture risk predicted from age and minimum T-score alone showed a significant gradient in observed fracture rates (low 5.1 [95% CI, 4.1-6.4], moderate 11.5 [95% CI, 10.1-13.0], high 25.4 [95% CI, 23.2-27.9] per 1000 person-years; p-for-trend <0.0001). There was an incremental increase in incident fracture rates from a prior fracture (13.9 [95% CI, 11.3-16.4] per 1000 person-years) or major CS use (11.2 [95% CI, 4.1-18.2] per 1000 person-years). This simplified fracture risk assessment system provides an assessment of fracture risk that is consistent with observed fracture rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19514851     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  14 in total

1.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Bone: Using FRAX wisely: lessons from Switzerland and beyond.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Hip fracture risk in older US adults by treatment eligibility status based on new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance.

Authors:  A C Looker; B Dawson-Hughes; A N A Tosteson; H Johansson; J A Kanis; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Is osteoporosis disease management cost effective?

Authors:  Richard Dell; Denise Greene
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Independent external validation of nomograms for predicting risk of low-trauma fracture and hip fracture.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; Tuan V Nguyen; Nguyen D Nguyen; Christopher S Kovacs; Jerilynn C Prior; Jacqueline R Center; Suzanne Morin; Robert G Josse; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; John A Eisman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Osteoporosis Canada 2010 guidelines for the assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Brian Lentle; Angela M Cheung; David A Hanley; William D Leslie; David Lyons; Alexandra Papaioannou; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; Anthony B Hodsman; Abida Sophina Jamal; Robert G Josse; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Suzanne Morin; Kerry Siminoski
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.

Authors:  L-A Fraser; L Langsetmo; C Berger; G Ioannidis; D Goltzman; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; R Josse; C S Kovacs; W P Olszynski; T Towheed; D A Hanley; S M Kaiser; J Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; J P Brown; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts.

Authors:  W D Leslie; C Berger; L Langsetmo; L M Lix; J D Adachi; D A Hanley; G Ioannidis; R G Josse; C S Kovacs; T Towheed; S Kaiser; W P Olszynski; J C Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; D Goltzman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Risk Assessment Tools for Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.