Literature DB >> 19513900

Comparison of two single-platform ISHAGE-based CD34 enumeration protocols on BD FACSCalibur and FACSCanto flow cytometers.

D Robert Sutherland1, Rakesh Nayyar, Erica Acton, Angeline Giftakis, Sue Dean, Victoria L Mosiman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Enumeration of viable CD34(+) cells provides critical information for the bone marrow (BM) transplant physician. The single-platform ISHAGE protocol is the most reliable method currently available to quantitate accurately this important subset of cells. Previous studies have shown that 5 CD34(+) cells/microL blood predicts the collection of at least 0.5x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg patient weight. From the apheresis product, infusion of 2.5x10(6) viable CD34(+) cells (measured pre-cryopreservation)/kg patient weight will reliably permit engraftment of the hematopoietic system (as measured by the time to 20000 platelets/microL) by day 12-14 post-infusion.
METHODS: We compared the CD34(+) cell numbers derived from Flow Count-based Stem-Kit; (Beckman Coulter) and Trucount tube-based stem cell enumeration (SCE) kit (BD Biosciences) ISHAGE templates on BD FACSCalibur and BD FACSCanto cytometers on 12 granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) and 10 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) samples.
RESULTS: Comparison of results showed that there was no statistical difference between samples run with Stem-Kit on the FACSCalibur versus SCE kit-based assays on either the FACSCalibur or FACSCanto. Mean results for the Stem-Kit/Calibur combination were 137, for SCE kit/Calibur 140 and for SCE kit/Canto 137 cells/microL. Pair-wise comparison of data based on rank order showed no statistically significant difference and all correlation coefficients had an R(2)>0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: The two kits generated very similar data on a range of fresh samples regardless of instrument platform. These results confirm and extend the utility of the single-platform ISHAGE protocols with a variety of reagent kits and instrument platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513900     DOI: 10.1080/14653240902923161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  12 in total

1.  Multicenter cell processing for cardiovascular regenerative medicine applications: the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) experience.

Authors:  Adrian P Gee; Sara Richman; April Durett; David McKenna; Jay Traverse; Timothy Henry; Diann Fisk; Carl Pepine; Jeannette Bloom; James Willerson; Karen Prater; David Zhao; Jane Reese Koç; Steven Ellis; Doris Taylor; Christopher Cogle; Lemuel Moyé; Robert Simari; Sonia Skarlatos
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.414

2.  Multi-site evaluation of the BD Stem Cell Enumeration Kit for CD34(+) cell enumeration on the BD FACSCanto II and BD FACSCalibur flow cytometers.

Authors:  Robert A Preti; Wai Shun Chan; Joanne Kurtzberg; Ronna E Dornsife; Paul K Wallace; Rosemary Furlage; Anna Lin; Imelda Omana-Zapata; Halvard Bonig; Torsten Tonn
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Evaluation of an easy and affordable flow cytometer for volumetric haematopoietic stem cell counting.

Authors:  Mariagabriella Mariani; Federico Colombo; Sonny M Assennato; Cecilia Frugoni; Alessandra Cattaneo; Elena Trombetta; Paolo Rebulla; Laura Porretti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Lost in Transplantation? Unexpected shift from multipotent to late lymphomyeloid hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in patients 1 year after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A Görgens; F Murke; L Kordelas; B Giebel
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Decitabine for the treatment of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: A report of two cases.

Authors:  Huifang Jiang; Zhonglin Wu; L I Ren; Diehong Tao; Hongyan Tong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Factors affecting the turnaround time for manufacturing, testing, and release of cellular therapy products prepared at multiple sites in support of multicenter cardiovascular regenerative medicine protocols: a Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) study.

Authors:  Sara Richman; Adrian P Gee; David H McKenna; Jay H Traverse; Timothy D Henry; Diann Fisk; Carl J Pepine; Jeannette Bloom; James T Willerson; Karen Prater; David Zhao; Jane Reese Koç; Saif Anwaruddin; Doris A Taylor; Christopher R Cogle; Lemuel A Moyé; Robert D Simari; Sonia I Skarlatos
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Cord blood units with low CD34+ cell viability have a low probability of engraftment after double unit transplantation.

Authors:  Andromachi Scaradavou; Katherine M Smith; Rebecca Hawke; Allison Schaible; Michelle Abboud; Nancy A Kernan; James W Young; Juliet N Barker
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Comparison of Two Apheresis Systems of COBE and Optia for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection.

Authors:  Se Na Lee; Ji Yeon Sohn; Jung Hee Kong; Hyeon Seok Eom; Hyewon Lee; Sun Young Kong
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  The feasibility and efficacy of subcutaneous plerixafor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in allogeneic HLA-identical sibling donors: results of the HOVON-107 study.

Authors:  Georgine E de Greef; Eric Braakman; Bronno van der Holt; Jeroen J W M Janssen; Eefke Petersen; Vladimir Vucinic; Nicole Thuss; Meriam Grootes; Jan J Cornelissen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Cord blood Lin(-)CD45(-) embryonic-like stem cells are a heterogeneous population that lack self-renewal capacity.

Authors:  Cesar Alvarez-Gonzalez; Richard Duggleby; Barbora Vagaska; Sergio Querol; Susana G Gomez; Patrizia Ferretti; Alejandro Madrigal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.