Literature DB >> 19513621

Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for assessment of HER-2 status in breast cancer patients.

Lin Wang1, Xiaobei Wang, Xiu Nie, Ling Ma.   

Abstract

The accurate assessment of a proto-oncogene, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 gene (HER-2), is extremely important for the therapy and prognosis of breast cancer. Currently, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the method widely used for the detection of HER-2 protein. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been suggested to be a golden standard assay for HER-2 amplification. This study examined the expression and amplification of HER-2 in paraffin-embedded sections of breast cancer tissues, and compared the two methods on the measurement of HER-2 status. HER-2 gene and protein were determined in breast cancer samples from 52 Chinese women by FISH and IHC respectively. The findings indicated that the HER-2 gene amplification was found in 18 cases (34.6%) by FISH and the HER-2 protein over-expression (score 3+) in 15 cases (28.8%) by IHC. Immunohistochemically, 28.6% of the cases scored as 2+ and 93.3% of the cases scored as 3+ were HER-2-positive by FISH. There was a significant correlation between the HER-2 gene amplification and HER-2 protein over-expression in breast cancer (P<0.005). No correlation was noted between the HER-2 gene amplification and any of the clinicopathological parameters examined, including age, menopausal status, menarche age, tumor size, histological tumor type, histological grade, lymph node status, and the expression of ER and PR. It was concluded that the detection of HER-2 gene amplification in breast cancer by FISH is valuable and can compare with HER-2 protein detection by IHC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513621     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-009-0318-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  15 in total

1.  Determination of HER-2 status and chromosome 17 polysomy in breast carcinomas comparing HercepTest and PathVysion FISH assay.

Authors:  Dolly Varshney; Yvonne Y Zhou; Stephen A Geller; Randa Alsabeh
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Does using a higher cutoff for the percentage of positive cells improve the specificity of HER-2 immunohistochemical analysis in breast carcinoma?

Authors:  Omar Hameed; David C Chhieng; Amy L Adams
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Lower HER-2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 ratio in cytologic HER-2 fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancers: three-dimensional analysis of intranuclear localization of centromere 17 and HER-2 signals.

Authors:  Hitoshi Itoh; Yoko Miyajima; Shinobu Umemura; Robert Y Osamura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2.

Authors:  D J Slamon; B Leyland-Jones; S Shak; H Fuchs; V Paton; A Bajamonde; T Fleming; W Eiermann; J Wolter; M Pegram; J Baselga; L Norton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Analysis of aneusomy level and HER-2 gene copy number and their effect on amplification rate in breast cancer specimens read as 2+ in immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  R Merola; M Mottolese; G Orlandi; E Vico; F Cognetti; I Sperduti; A Fabi; G Vitelli; A M Cianciulli
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Prognostic utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for determining HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Kammori; Rie Kurabayashi; Mitsuhiko Kashio; Akiko Sakamoto; Masataka Yoshimoto; Sadao Amano; Michio Kaminishi; Tetsu Yamada; Kaiyo Takubo
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Evaluation of and quality assurance in HER2 analysis in breast carcinomas from patients registered in Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) in the period of 2002-2006. A nationwide study including correlation between HER-2 status and other prognostic variables.

Authors:  Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Michael Andersson; Ib J Christensen; Susanne Møller
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Calibration of immunohistochemistry for assessment of HER2 in breast cancer: results of the French multicentre GEFPICS study.

Authors:  A Vincent-Salomon; G MacGrogan; J Couturier; L Arnould; Y Denoux; M Fiche; J Jacquemier; M-C Mathieu; F Penault-Llorca; C Rigaud; P Roger; I Treilleux; M-O Vilain; S Mathoulin-Pélissier; V Le Doussal
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Breast cancer subtypes and survival in patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Nam; Sun Young Kim; Hye-Sook Han; Youngmee Kwon; Keun Seok Lee; Tae Hyun Kim; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reproductive Factors, Steroid Receptor Status, and Tumour Markers of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Northern China.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Yuan; Xuezhen Song; Min Jiang; Qiujing Li; Xiaodan Liu; Mingyi Wang
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.