Literature DB >> 19513577

The cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis.

F Borgström1, O Ström, J Coelho, H Johansson, A Oden, E McCloskey, J A Kanis.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate was compared to no treatment in UK women using the FRAX algorithm for fracture risk assessment. At a willingness-to-pay of pound 30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), strontium ranelate was generally cost-effective in women with prior fracture at the threshold of osteoporosis from an age of 65 years.
INTRODUCTION: The objectives of the study were to estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the UK for the treatment of osteoporosis and to establish intervention thresholds for treatment using the FRAX tool.
METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate was compared to no treatment in postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture using a lifetime simulation model based on Markov cohort methodology that incorporated the features of FRAX.
RESULTS: At a threshold of pound 30,000 per QALY, strontium ranelate was generally cost-effective in women from an age of 65 years with prior fracture at the threshold of osteoporosis (i.e., a T-score of -2.5 SD) and in women with a prior fracture (and no information on bone mineral density) from the age of 65 years. At a threshold of pound 20,000, strontium ranelate became cost-effective at a 10-year fracture probability of 25.7% and at 16.9% with a threshold of pound 30,000 for a QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Strontium ranelate is a cost-effective agent for the treatment of established osteoporosis in women over the age of 65 years. Cost-effective scenarios were also found for the prevention and treatment of fractures associated with osteoporosis, in younger women with additional clinical risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513577     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0971-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  56 in total

1.  Effect and offset of effect of treatments for hip fracture on health outcomes.

Authors:  B Jonsson; J Kanis; A Dawson; A Oden; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Niklas Zethraeus; Olof Johnell; Lars Lidgren; Sari Ponzer; Olle Svensson; Peter Abdon; Ewald Ornstein; Karl Lunsjö; Karl Göran Thorngren; Ingemar Sernbo; Clas Rehnberg; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries--an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial.

Authors:  O Ström; F Borgström; S S Sen; S Boonen; P Haentjens; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Borgström; O Johnell; J A Kanis; B Jönsson; C Rehnberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Mortality after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX).

Authors:  S Fujiwara; T Nakamura; H Orimo; T Hosoi; I Gorai; A Oden; H Johansson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  14 in total

1.  Comparative cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene and raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Europe, using the FRAX algorithm.

Authors:  K Kim; A Svedbom; X Luo; S Sutradhar; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Strontium ranelate: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks; Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Silvia M Evers; Wafa Ben Sedrine; John A Kanis; Bram Ramaekers; Jean-Yves Reginster; Stuart Silverman; Caroline E Wyers; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost-effective intervention thresholds against osteoporotic fractures based on FRAX® in Switzerland.

Authors:  K Lippuner; H Johansson; F Borgström; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Current and future treatment options in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Linda Brewer; David Williams; Alan Moore
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Intervention thresholds for denosumab in the UK using a FRAX®-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  O Ström; B Jönsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Recent advances in managing osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudia Gagnon; Peter R Ebeling
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-12-15

Review 8.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  What was your fracture risk evaluated by FRAX® the day before your osteoporotic fracture?

Authors:  Bérengère Aubry-Rozier; Delphine Stoll; Marc-Antoine Krieg; Olivier Lamy; Didier Hans
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Screening in the Community to Reduce Osteoporotic Fractures in Older Women in the UK: Economic Evaluation of the SCOOP Study.

Authors:  David A Turner; Rebekah Fong Soe Khioe; Lee Shepstone; Elizabeth Lenaghan; Cyrus Cooper; Neil Gittoes; Nicholas C Harvey; Richard Holland; Amanda Howe; Eugene McCloskey; Terence W O'Neill; David Torgerson; Richard Fordham
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.