Literature DB >> 19513142

Comparison of computer-mediated learning and lecture-mediated learning for teaching pain management to pharmacy students.

Dana J Jamero1, Amne Borghol, Linda Mihm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and student satisfaction with computer-mediated instruction (CMI) versus lecture-mediated instruction (LMI) of pain management to doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students.
METHODS: This study compared the instruction of pain management by CMI versus LMI. An examination was administered and a student survey was conducted to determine effectiveness and student perception of efficiency and satisfaction with these teaching methods.
RESULTS: Mean examination scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups, with 62 (91%) of the LMI group and 46 (94%) of the CMI group scoring > or =70% (p = 0.73). Efficiency and student perception of learning significantly increased in the CMI group.
CONCLUSIONS: CMI appears to be at least as effective as LMI in teaching pain management to pharmacy students and students perceive that efficiency and learning is increased with CMI. Therefore, CMI seems to be a viable teaching option.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; computer-mediated instruction; pain management

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513142      PMCID: PMC2690874          DOI: 10.5688/aj730105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  7 in total

1.  JCAHO pain management standards are unveiled. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

Authors:  D M Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Technology-based vs. traditional instruction. A comparison of two methods for teaching the skill of performing a 12-lead ECG.

Authors:  Pamela R Jeffries; Shirley Woolf; Beverly Linde
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

3.  CD-ROM use in health instruction.

Authors:  S M Dorman
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  Medical student concentration during lectures.

Authors:  J Stuart; R J Rutherford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-09-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Pain management content in curricula of U.S. schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Rubina M Singh; Susan L Wyant
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

6.  People in pain: how do they seek relief?

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Gary Langer; Jon Cohen; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 7.  What should be the core outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials?

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 5.156

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  The use of virtual laboratories and other web-based tools in a drug assay course.

Authors:  Marissa Waldman Dunham; Konstantine Ghirtis; Mustapha Beleh
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Effectiveness of educational technology to improve patient care in pharmacy curricula.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.