PURPOSE: Extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer (EMMPRIN) is a tumor surface protein that promotes growth and is overexpressed in head and neck cancer. These features make it a potential therapeutic target for monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapy. Because molecular therapy is considered more effective when delivered with conventional cytotoxic agents, anti-EMMPRIN therapy was assessed alone and in combination with external beam radiation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using a murine flank model, loss of EMMPRIN function was achieved by transfection with a small interfering RNA against EMMPRIN or treatment with a chimeric anti-EMMPRIN blocking mAb. Cytokine expression was assessed for xenografts, tumor cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. RESULTS: Animals treated with anti-EMMPRIN mAb had delayed tumor growth compared with untreated controls, whereas treatment with combination radiation and anti-EMMPRIN mAb showed the greatest reduction in tumor growth (P = 0.001). Radiation-treated EMMPRIN knockdown xenografts showed a reduction in tumor growth compared with untreated knockdown controls (P = 0.01), whereas radiation-treated EMMPRIN-expressing xenografts did not show a delay in tumor growth. Immunohistochemical evaluation for Ki67 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) resulted in a reduction in proliferation (P = 0.007) and increased apoptosis in anti-EMMPRIN mAb-treated xenografts compared with untreated controls (P = 0.087). In addition, we provide evidence that EMMPRIN suppression results in decreased interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, and IL-8 cytokine production, in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that anti-EMMPRIN antibody inhibits tumor cell proliferation in vivo and may represent a novel targeted treatment option in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
PURPOSE: Extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer (EMMPRIN) is a tumor surface protein that promotes growth and is overexpressed in head and neck cancer. These features make it a potential therapeutic target for monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapy. Because molecular therapy is considered more effective when delivered with conventional cytotoxic agents, anti-EMMPRIN therapy was assessed alone and in combination with external beam radiation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using a murine flank model, loss of EMMPRIN function was achieved by transfection with a small interfering RNA against EMMPRIN or treatment with a chimeric anti-EMMPRIN blocking mAb. Cytokine expression was assessed for xenografts, tumor cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. RESULTS: Animals treated with anti-EMMPRIN mAb had delayed tumor growth compared with untreated controls, whereas treatment with combination radiation and anti-EMMPRIN mAb showed the greatest reduction in tumor growth (P = 0.001). Radiation-treated EMMPRIN knockdown xenografts showed a reduction in tumor growth compared with untreated knockdown controls (P = 0.01), whereas radiation-treated EMMPRIN-expressing xenografts did not show a delay in tumor growth. Immunohistochemical evaluation for Ki67 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) resulted in a reduction in proliferation (P = 0.007) and increased apoptosis in anti-EMMPRIN mAb-treated xenografts compared with untreated controls (P = 0.087). In addition, we provide evidence that EMMPRIN suppression results in decreased interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, and IL-8 cytokine production, in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that anti-EMMPRIN antibody inhibits tumor cell proliferation in vivo and may represent a novel targeted treatment option in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: T Sameshima; K Nabeshima; B P Toole; K Yokogami; Y Okada; T Goya; M Koono; S Wakisaka Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2000-09-01 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: M N Saleh; K P Raisch; M A Stackhouse; W E Grizzle; J A Bonner; M S Mayo; H G Kim; R F Meredith; R H Wheeler; D J Buchsbaum Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: S Zucker; M Hymowitz; E E Rollo; R Mann; C E Conner; J Cao; H D Foda; D C Tompkins; B P Toole Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Nemil Shah; Guihua Zhai; Joseph A Knowles; Cecil R Stockard; William E Grizzle; Naomi Fineberg; Tong Zhou; Kurt R Zinn; Eben L Rosenthal; Hyunki Kim Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Miriam Walter; Elina Simanovich; Vera Brod; Nitza Lahat; Haim Bitterman; Michal A Rahat Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Hyunki Kim; Guihua Zhai; Zhiyong Liu; Sharon Samuel; Nemil Shah; Emily E Helman; Joseph A Knowles; Cecil R Stockard; Naomi S Fineberg; William E Grizzle; Tong Zhou; Kurt R Zinn; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Zhiyong Liu; Yolanda E Hartman; Jason M Warram; Joseph A Knowles; Larissa Sweeny; Tong Zhou; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Matthew R Zeiderman; Michael E Egger; Charles W Kimbrough; Christopher G England; Tess V Dupre; Kelly M McMasters; Lacey R McNally Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 2.192