Literature DB >> 19508448

Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes.

Michael K Lindell1, Sudha Arlikatti, Carla S Prater.   

Abstract

This study examined respondents' self-reported adoption of 16 hazard adjustments (preimpact actions to reduce danger to persons and property), their perceptions of those adjustments' attributes, and the correlations of those perceived attributes with respondents' demographic characteristics. The sample comprised 561 randomly selected residents from three cities in Southern California prone to high seismic risk and three cities from Western Washington prone to moderate seismic risks. The results show that the hazard adjustment perceptions were defined by hazard-related attributes and resource-related attributes. More significantly, the respondents had a significant degree of consensus in their ratings of those attributes and used them to differentiate among the hazard adjustments, as indicated by statistically significant differences among the hazard adjustment profiles. Finally, there were many significant correlations between respondents' demographic characteristics and the perceived characteristics of hazard adjustments, but there were few consistent patterns among these correlations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508448     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  13 in total

1.  The public's preparedness: self-reliance, flashbulb memories, and conservative values.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg; Susannah Dyen; Stacey Elliott
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The likelihood of having a household emergency plan: understanding factors in the US context.

Authors:  Jason D Rivera
Journal:  Nat Hazards (Dordr)       Date:  2020-08-06

3.  Assessing Households Preparedness for Earthquakes: An Exploratory Study in the Development of a Valid and Reliable Persian-version Tool.

Authors:  Ali Ardalan; Sanaz Sohrabizadeh
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2016-02-25

4.  Hazard proximity and risk perception of tsunamis in coastal cities: Are people able to identify their risk?

Authors:  Juan Pablo Arias; Nicolás C Bronfman; Pamela C Cisternas; Paula B Repetto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Risk, Transformation and Adaptation: Ideas for Reframing Approaches to Disaster Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Douglas Paton; Petra Buergelt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Social Networks, Trust, and Disaster-Risk Perceptions of Rural Residents in a Multi-Disaster Environment: Evidence from Sichuan, China.

Authors:  Kaijing Xue; Shili Guo; Yi Liu; Shaoquan Liu; Dingde Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The influence of new information that contradicts common knowledge about earthquake preparedness in Israel: A mixed methods experiment study.

Authors:  Anat Gesser-Edelsburg; Mina Zemach; Ricky Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Maya Negev; Gustavo S Mesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exposure Path Perceptions and Protective Actions in Biological Water Contamination Emergencies.

Authors:  Michael K Lindell; Jeryl L Mumpower; Shih-Kai Huang; Hao-Che Wu; Charles D Samuelson
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2015-11-15

9.  Mitigation Policy Acceptance Model: An Analysis of Individual Decision Making Process toward Residential Seismic Strengthening.

Authors:  Hao-Teng Cheng; Ko-Wan Tsou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Risk of a disaster: Risk knowledge, interpretation and resilience.

Authors:  Osamuede Odiase; Suzanne Wilkinson; Andreas Neef
Journal:  Jamba       Date:  2020-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.