Literature DB >> 19508415

Inverted duplications deletions: underdiagnosed rearrangements??

O Zuffardi1, M Bonaglia, R Ciccone, R Giorda.   

Abstract

Molecular techniques led to the discovery that several chromosome rearrangements interpreted as terminal duplications were in fact inverted duplications contiguous to terminal deletions. Inv dup del rearrangements originate through a symmetric dicentric chromosome that, after asymmetric breakage, generates an inv dup del and a deleted chromosome. In recurrent inverted duplications the dicentric chromosome is formed at meiosis through non-allelic homologous recombination. In non-recurrent inv dup del cases, dicentric intermediates are formed by non-homologous end joining or intrastrand annealing. Some authors hypothesized that in these cases the dicentric may have been formed directly in the zygote. Healing of the broken dicentric chromosomes can occur not only in a telomerase-dependent way but also through telomere capture and circularization thus creating translocated or ring inv dup del chromosomes. In all the cases reported up to now, the duplicated region was always longer than the deleted one, but we can safely assume that there is another group of rearrangements where the deleted region is longer than the duplicated portion. In general, in these cases, the cytogeneticist will suspect the presence of a deletion and confirm it by FISH with a subtelomeric probe, but he/she will almost certainly miss the duplication. It is likely that the conventional analysis techniques used until now have led to a substantial underestimate of the frequency of inv dup del rearrangements and that the widespread use of array-CGH in routine analysis will allow a more realistic estimate. Obviously, the concomitant presence of deletion and duplication has important consequences in genotype/phenotype correlations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508415     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01187.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  27 in total

Review 1.  On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: the role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Albino Bacolla; Claude Férec; Karen M Vasquez; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; Jian-Min Chen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  De novo unbalanced translocations have a complex history/aetiology.

Authors:  Maria Clara Bonaglia; Nehir Edibe Kurtas; Edoardo Errichiello; Sara Bertuzzo; Silvana Beri; Mana M Mehrjouy; Aldesia Provenzano; Debora Vergani; Vanna Pecile; Francesca Novara; Paolo Reho; Marilena Carmela Di Giacomo; Giancarlo Discepoli; Roberto Giorda; Micheala A Aldred; Cíntia Barros Santos-Rebouças; Andressa Pereira Goncalves; Diane N Abuelo; Sabrina Giglio; Ivana Ricca; Fabrizia Franchi; Philippos Patsalis; Carolina Sismani; María Angeles Morí; Julián Nevado; Niels Tommerup; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders.

Authors:  Claudia M B Carvalho; James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Human subtelomeric copy number gains suggest a DNA replication mechanism for formation: beyond breakage-fusion-bridge for telomere stabilization.

Authors:  Svetlana A Yatsenko; Patricia Hixson; Erin K Roney; Daryl A Scott; Christian P Schaaf; Yu-tze Ng; Robbin Palmer; Richard B Fisher; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Genomic profile of copy number variants on the short arm of human chromosome 8.

Authors:  Shihui Yu; Stephanie Fiedler; Andrew Stegner; William D Graf
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  De novo dir dup/del of 18q characterized by SNP arrays and FISH in a girl child with mixed phenotypes.

Authors:  Carlos Córdova-Fletes; Enrique Sáinz-González; Roberto Iván Avendaño-Gálvez; Azubel Ramírez-Velazco; Horacio Rivera; Rocío Ortiz-López; Eliakym Arámbula-Meraz; Verónica Judith Picos-Cárdenas
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Sub-fertile sperm cells exemplify telomere dysfunction.

Authors:  Tal Biron-Shental; Amir Wiser; Anat Hershko-Klement; Ofer Markovitch; Aliza Amiel; Arie Berkovitch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Low-copy repeats at the human VIPR2 gene predispose to recurrent and nonrecurrent rearrangements.

Authors:  Silvana Beri; Maria Clara Bonaglia; Roberto Giorda
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Clinical significance and mechanisms associated with segmental UPD.

Authors:  Peter R Papenhausen; Carla A Kelly; Samuel Harris; Samantha Caldwell; Stuart Schwartz; Andrea Penton
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Mechanisms of telomere loss and their consequences for chromosome instability.

Authors:  Keiko Muraki; Kristine Nyhan; Limei Han; John P Murnane
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.