Literature DB >> 19508260

Effects of glass fiber layering on the flexural strength of microfill and hybrid composites.

Nesrin Eronat1, Umit Candan, Murat Türkün.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: In stress-bearing cavities, low fracture resistance adversely affects the longevity of the dental resin composite restorations.
PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of glass fiber layering on the flexural strength of microfill and hybrid composites.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flexural test specimens (N = 75) were prepared according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4049 specifications (25 x 2 x 2 mm) by using a standard metallic mold. Materials used and groups were as follows (N = 15): group 1: hybrid composite (Clearfil APX, Kuraray Co.Ltd, Osaka, Japan); group 2: microfill composite (Clearfil ST, Kuraray Co.Ltd.); group 3: hybrid + microfill composite; group 4: woven glass fiber (EverstickNet, StickTech Ltd, Turku, Finland) + hybrid composite; group 5: woven glass fiber + microfill composite. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. Afterward, they were loaded to fracture (1 mm/min) by using a universal testing machine (AG-50 kNG Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). Flexural strengths were expressed as maximum flexural load per cross-sectional area of the specimen. The results were statistically analyzed with Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.01).
RESULTS: Significant increases in the flexural strength were found for both hybrid and microfill composites when fiber layering was used (group 1: 78 +/- 7 MPa; group 4: 93 +/- 4 MPa) (group 2: 42 +/- 5 MPa; group 5: 64 +/- 4 MPa) (p < 0.01). Flexural strength of fiber-reinforced hybrid composite was significantly higher than the other groups evaluated (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in flexural strength between microfill/hybrid combination and fiber-reinforced microfill composite (p > 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Glass fiber layering of microfill and hybrid composites presented higher flexural strength, and veneering of hybrid composite with microfill composite increased the resistance of the restoration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508260     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00259.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  4 in total

1.  The effect of glass and polyethylene fiber reinforcement on flexural strength of provisional restorative resins: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Natarajan; C Thulasingam
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-14

2.  Flexural strength of glass and polyethylene fiber combined with three different composites.

Authors:  F Sharafeddin; Aa Alavi; Z Talei
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2013-03

3.  Reinforcement of dental methacrylate with glass fiber after heated silane application.

Authors:  Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Marcella Silva de Paula; Isabella Negro Favarão; Amanda Vessoni Barbosa Kasuya; Letícia Nunes de Almeida; Gustavo Adolfo Martins Mendes; Hugo Lemes Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber.

Authors:  Maryam Doozandeh; Ali Asghar Alavi; Zahra Karimizadeh
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.