Literature DB >> 19507976

On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior.

Jana Brunner1, Susanne Fuchs, Pascal Perrier.   

Abstract

In this study the acoustic and articulatory variabilities of speakers with different palate shapes were compared. Since the cross-sectional area of the vocal tract changes less for a slight change in tongue position if the palate is domeshaped than if it is flat, the acoustic variability should be greater for flat palates than for domeshaped ones. Consequently, it can be hypothesized that speakers with flat palates should reduce their articulatory variability in order to keep the acoustic output constant. This hypothesis was tested on 32 speakers recorded via electropalatography (EPG) and acoustics. The articulatory and acoustic variability of some of their vowels and /j/ was measured. Indeed, the results show that the speakers with flat palates reduce their variability in tongue height. There is no such trend in acoustic variability.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19507976     DOI: 10.1121/1.3125313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  A Computational Model Quantifies the Effect of Anatomical Variability on Velopharyngeal Function.

Authors:  Joshua M Inouye; Jamie L Perry; Kant Y Lin; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Variability in individual constriction contributions to third formant values in American English /ɹ/.

Authors:  Sarah Harper; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Quantifying Tongue Tip Shape in Apical and Laminal /s/: Contributions of Palate Shape.

Authors:  Maureen Stone; Arnold D Gomez; Jiachen Zhuo; Ange Lydie Tchouaga; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Tongue pressure during swallowing in adults with down syndrome and its relationship with palatal morphology.

Authors:  Megumi Hashimoto; Kazuko Igari; Soshi Hanawa; Ayumi Ito; Atsushi Takahashi; Naoko Ishida; Shigeto Koyama; Takahiro Ono; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  Speech impairment in Down syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Speaker verification based on the fusion of speech acoustics and inverted articulatory signals.

Authors:  Ming Li; Jangwon Kim; Adam Lammert; Prasanta Kumar Ghosh; Vikram Ramanarayanan; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.899

7.  The Effects of Palate Features and Glossectomy Surgery on /s/ Production.

Authors:  Dana L Grimm; Maureen Stone; Jonghye Woo; Junghoon Lee; Jun-Hyuk Hwang; Gary E Bedrosian; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Variability of articulator positions and formants across nine English vowels.

Authors:  D H Whalen; Wei-Rong Chen; Mark K Tiede; Hosung Nam
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-02-23

9.  Variability in English vowels is comparable in articulation and acoustics.

Authors:  Aude Noiray; Khalil Iskarous; D H Whalen
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2014-05-01

10.  Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Michael Proctor; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.