Literature DB >> 19507422

On producing random binary sequences.

Raymond S Nickerson1, Susan F Butler.   

Abstract

This experiment addressed the opinion prevailing among researchers that people are poor at producing random binary sequences. Participants tried to produce sets of sequences of outcomes of imaginary coin tosses that could not be distinguished statistically from sets expected from actual coin tossing. The results generally support the conclusion that people are not very good at this task, although the distributional properties of the sets of sequences produced are qualitatively similar to those expected of sets produced by a random process. The results do not support the common finding that people consistently produce substantially more alternations and fewer repetitions than would be produced by chance, nor do they provide evidence of the pervasive operation of a gambler's fallacy manifesting itself in a tendency for an alternation to increase with the length of a preceding run.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19507422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  5 in total

1.  Heterogeneous Suppression of Sequential Effects in Random Sequence Generation, but Not in Operant Learning.

Authors:  Hanan Shteingart; Yonatan Loewenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why?

Authors:  George D Farmer; Paul A Warren; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-01

3.  Characterizing human random-sequence generation in competitive and non-competitive environments using Lempel-Ziv complexity.

Authors:  Alice Wong; Garance Merholz; Uri Maoz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Decision-making after continuous wins or losses in a randomized guessing task: implications for how the prior selection results affect subsequent decision-making.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Xiao Lin; Hongli Zhou; Xiaoxia Du
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  A re-examination of "bias" in human randomness perception.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Umberto Gostoli; George D Farmer; Wael El-Deredy; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.