Literature DB >> 19506946

Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients: experience of 401 cases at a single institution.

Koya Hida1, Takashi Yamaguchi, Hiroaki Hata, Hiroya Kuroyanagi, Satoshi Nagayama, Harue Tada, Satoshi Teramukai, Masanori Fukushima, Kinya Koizumi, Yoshiharu Sakai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for the treatment of colorectal cancer, but little is known about perioperative risk factors for complications.
METHODS: Clinical data were reviewed for 401 consecutive unselected colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery at Kyoto Medical Center between 1998 and 2005. The outcome variable was incidence of postoperative complications. Using logistic regression analysis, 58 background, clinical, preoperative, and intraoperative factors were assessed as potential predictors of complications.
RESULTS: The set of independent protective factors that had the greatest influence on the incidence of local complications after colon surgery was as follows: cefmetazole use for prophylaxis (versus oral only; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.54), high operative infusion rate (per ml/min; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95), regular laxative use (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.79), and double-stapled anastomosis (versus hand-sewn; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.83). Independent risk factors for local complications after rectal surgery were abdominoperineal resection (versus low anterior resection, OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.64-14.9), long operative time (per hour, OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.23), and history of heart disease (OR 5.18, 95% CI 1.34-21.5). The occurrence of complications was not found to be associated with overall survival in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified intraoperative management such as low operative infusion rate is one of the independent significant risk factors for complications after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in addition to patient characteristics and surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506946     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0055-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

3.  Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Edward Ram; Yevgeni Sherman; Ruben Weil; Tali Vishne; Dragan Kravarusic; Zeev Dreznik
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-03

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered?

Authors:  Jennifer Blumetti; Myda Luu; George Sarosi; Kathleen Hartless; Jackie McFarlin; Betty Parker; Sean Dineen; Sergio Huerta; Massimo Asolati; Esteban Varela; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Constipation, laxative use and risk of colorectal cancer: The Miyagi Cohort Study.

Authors:  T Watanabe; N Nakaya; K Kurashima; S Kuriyama; Y Tsubono; I Tsuji
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Wound infection after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Shin Fujita; Takayuki Akasu; Seiji Ishiguro; Yutaka Kobayashi; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Selim Dincler; Peter Buchmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

Authors:  P Y G Choy; I P Bissett; J G Docherty; B R Parry; A E H Merrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Y Li; S Wang; S Gao; C Yang; W Yang; S Guo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Nasal MRSA screening for surgical patients: predictive value for postoperative infections caused by MRSA.

Authors:  Yutaka Matsubara; Hideaki Uchiyama; Takahiro Higashi; Ai Edagawa; Hirokuni Ishii; Shigeyuki Nagata; Kenkichi Hashimoto; Daihiko Eguchi; Hirofumi Kawanaka; Toshirou Okuyama; Masahiro Tateishi; Daisuke Korenaga; Kenji Takenaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Critical care provision after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  C D Dale; P McLoone; B Sloan; J Kinsella; D Morrison; K Puxty; T Quasim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.

Authors:  Qingchao Tang; Yihao Zhu; Huan Xiong; Xiangzong Sheng; Zhiqiao Hu; Hanqing Hu; Rui Huang; Qian Zhang; Ziming Yuan; Lei Xie; Zhifeng Gao; Yuliuming Wang; Guiyu Wang; Xishan Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Postoperative complications after robotic resection of colorectal cancer: An analysis based on 5-year experience at a large-scale center.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Huang; Zhen Zhou; Hao-Ran Shi; Tai-Yuan Li; Shan-Ping Ye
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis.

Authors:  Daiane Oliveira Tayar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Ivan Cecconello; Tiago M Magalhães; Claudia M Simões; José Otávio C Auler
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-09-12

7.  Effects of acupuncture treatment on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in colorectal cancer: study protocol for randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xueyan Liu; Zhijie Wang; Hao Yao; Yanrong Yang; Huijuan Cao; Zhanhao Toh; Ruwen Zheng; Yi Ren
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.