Literature DB >> 19506499

Effectiveness of universal screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to a burn-trauma step-down unit.

Lucy Wibbenmeyer1, Dianna Appelgate, Ingrid Williams, Timothy Light, Barbara Latenser, Robert Lewis, Gerald Patrick Kealey, Yiyi Chen, Obiora Onwuameze, Loreen Herwaldt.   

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are significant healthcare-associated pathogens. We sought to identify factors that could be used to predict which patients carry or are infected with VRE or MRSA on admission so that we could obtain cultures selectively from high-risk patients on our burn-trauma unit. We conducted a case-control study of patients admitted to our burn-trauma unit from September 2000 to March 2005 who were colonized or infected with either VRE or MRSA (cases) and patients who were not colonized or infected with one of these organisms (controls). We used logistic regression to construct a model that we subsequently validated based on data collected prospectively from patients admitted from September 2006 to August 2007. In the case-control study, colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE on admission were independently associated with the total days of antimicrobial treatment, age, prior hospitalization, prior operations, and admitting diagnosis (admission for a burn injury was protective). In the cohort study, a prior hospitalization with a length of stay>or=7 days and operations within the past 6 months were significantly associated with colonization or infection on admission. The latter model was 59.3% sensitive. If, we used this model to identify which patients should be cultured on admission, we would have missed 24 (39.3%) of the colonized or infected patients. These patients would not have been placed in isolation (434 missed isolation days, 71.0%) and may have been the source of transmission to other patients. Our model lacked the sensitivity to identify patients colonized or infected with VRE or MRSA. We recommend that units, which care for patients who are at high risk of hospital-acquired infection and having prevalence and transmission rates of VRE or MRSA similar to those in our study, screen all patients for these organisms on admission to the unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506499     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181abff7e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  5 in total

1.  Pre-Operative Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection: A Review of the Clinical-Effectiveness and Guidelines.

Authors: 
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2010-06-01

2.  The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a burn trauma unit.

Authors:  Marin Schweizer; Melissa Ward; Sandra Cobb; Jennifer McDanel; Laurie Leder; Lucy Wibbenmeyer; Barbara Latenser; Daniel Diekema; Loreen Herwaldt
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Bacterial Infections After Burn Injuries: Impact of Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  Anne M Lachiewicz; Christopher G Hauck; David J Weber; Bruce A Cairns; David van Duin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Trends and significance of VRE colonization in the ICU: a meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Panayiotis D Ziakas; Rachana Thapa; Louis B Rice; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolates among burn patients at Yekatit 12 Hospital Burn Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tsegaye Sewunet; Yohanes Demissie; Adane Mihret; Tamrat Abebe
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2013-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.