MOTIVATION: Chromatin states are the key to gene regulation and cell identity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-Seq) is increasingly being used to map epigenetic states across genomes of diverse species. Chromatin modification profiles are frequently noisy and diffuse, spanning regions ranging from several nucleosomes to large domains of multiple genes. Much of the early work on the identification of ChIP-enriched regions for ChIP-Seq data has focused on identifying localized regions, such as transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatic tools to identify diffuse domains of ChIP-enriched regions have been lacking. RESULTS: Based on the biological observation that histone modifications tend to cluster to form domains, we present a method that identifies spatial clusters of signals unlikely to appear by chance. This method pools together enrichment information from neighboring nucleosomes to increase sensitivity and specificity. By using genomic-scale analysis, as well as the examination of loci with validated epigenetic states, we demonstrate that this method outperforms existing methods in the identification of ChIP-enriched signals for histone modification profiles. We demonstrate the application of this unbiased method in important issues in ChIP-Seq data analysis, such as data normalization for quantitative comparison of levels of epigenetic modifications across cell types and growth conditions. AVAILABILITY: http://home.gwu.edu/ approximately wpeng/Software.htm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Chromatin states are the key to gene regulation and cell identity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-Seq) is increasingly being used to map epigenetic states across genomes of diverse species. Chromatin modification profiles are frequently noisy and diffuse, spanning regions ranging from several nucleosomes to large domains of multiple genes. Much of the early work on the identification of ChIP-enriched regions for ChIP-Seq data has focused on identifying localized regions, such as transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatic tools to identify diffuse domains of ChIP-enriched regions have been lacking. RESULTS: Based on the biological observation that histone modifications tend to cluster to form domains, we present a method that identifies spatial clusters of signals unlikely to appear by chance. This method pools together enrichment information from neighboring nucleosomes to increase sensitivity and specificity. By using genomic-scale analysis, as well as the examination of loci with validated epigenetic states, we demonstrate that this method outperforms existing methods in the identification of ChIP-enriched signals for histone modification profiles. We demonstrate the application of this unbiased method in important issues in ChIP-Seq data analysis, such as data normalization for quantitative comparison of levels of epigenetic modifications across cell types and growth conditions. AVAILABILITY: http://home.gwu.edu/ approximately wpeng/Software.htm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Florian M Pauler; Mathew A Sloane; Ru Huang; Kakkad Regha; Martha V Koerner; Ido Tamir; Andreas Sommer; Andras Aszodi; Thomas Jenuwein; Denise P Barlow Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: A Gordon Robertson; Mikhail Bilenky; Angela Tam; Yongjun Zhao; Thomas Zeng; Nina Thiessen; Timothee Cezard; Anthony P Fejes; Elizabeth D Wederell; Rebecca Cullum; Ghia Euskirchen; Martin Krzywinski; Inanc Birol; Michael Snyder; Pamela A Hoodless; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Steven J M Jones Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Joel Rozowsky; Ghia Euskirchen; Raymond K Auerbach; Zhengdong D Zhang; Theodore Gibson; Robert Bjornson; Nicholas Carriero; Michael Snyder; Mark B Gerstein Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2009-01-04 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Anton Valouev; David S Johnson; Andreas Sundquist; Catherine Medina; Elizabeth Anton; Serafim Batzoglou; Richard M Myers; Arend Sidow Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Yong Zhang; Tao Liu; Clifford A Meyer; Jérôme Eeckhoute; David S Johnson; Bradley E Bernstein; Chad Nusbaum; Richard M Myers; Myles Brown; Wei Li; X Shirley Liu Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Florencia Pratto; Kevin Brick; Pavel Khil; Fatima Smagulova; Galina V Petukhova; R Daniel Camerini-Otero Journal: Science Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Hume Stroud; Sofía Otero; Bénédicte Desvoyes; Elena Ramírez-Parra; Steven E Jacobsen; Crisanto Gutierrez Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roberto Papait; Paola Cattaneo; Paolo Kunderfranco; Carolina Greco; Pierluigi Carullo; Alessandro Guffanti; Valentina Viganò; Giuliano Giuseppe Stirparo; Michael V G Latronico; Gerd Hasenfuss; Ju Chen; Gianluigi Condorelli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 11.205