Literature DB >> 19505350

Health technology assessment in the United States.

Bryan Luce1, Rebecca Singer Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe and explore the reasons for the current health technology assessment (HTA) landscape in the United States.
METHODS: Relying on multiple historical literature and other documents as well as drawing on personal experiences and observations, we describe, evaluate, and explain the evolving and dynamic HTA-related evidence landscape.
RESULTS: The present HTA-related landscape is a product of a dynamic, somewhat turbulent path in the United States. Many early aggressive federal efforts beginning in the 1970s were rejected in the 1980s only to be revived by the mid-1990s and continue to strengthen today, likely due to diffusing private sector political opposition from de-linking HTA from policy decisions (e.g., coverage, clinical guidelines) and omitting economic evaluation. Meanwhile, private sector HTA efforts have remained active during the entire period.
CONCLUSIONS: The current HTA-related landscape is at least as dynamic as it has been at any point in its turbulent 30-year history and is likely to continue as health reform in the US is debated once again.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19505350     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309090400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  8 in total

Review 1.  International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Craig Mitton; Karissa M Johnston; Brian Harrigan; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  EBM, HTA, and CER: clearing the confusion.

Authors:  Bryan R Luce; Michael Drummond; Bengt Jönsson; Peter J Neumann; J Sanford Schwartz; Uwe Siebert; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Is the US "leading from behind" on health policy?

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Cayla J Saret
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12-10

4.  Health technology assessment in India: Reflection & future roadmap.

Authors:  Shankar Prinja; Kavitha Rajsekhar; Vijay Kumar Gauba
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Putting Stakeholder Engagement at the Center of Health Economic Modeling for Health Technology Assessment in the United States.

Authors:  Richard Z Xie; Erica deFur Malik; Mark T Linthicum; Jennifer L Bright
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Medicare Spending on Drugs and Biologics Not Recommended for Coverage by International Health Technology Assessment Agencies.

Authors:  Alexander C Egilman; Joshua D Wallach; Sanket S Dhruva; Gregg S Gonsalves; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Abdolvahab Baghbanian; Tracy Merlin; Drew Carter; Shuhong Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Clinical photoacoustic imaging of cancer.

Authors:  Keerthi S Valluru; Juergen K Willmann
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.