Literature DB >> 19505090

Effect of pressure, particle size, and time on optimizing performance in liquid chromatography.

Peter W Carr1, Xiaoli Wang, Dwight R Stoll.   

Abstract

Although the principles of optimization of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have a long history starting with the work of Giddings in the 1960s and continuing with work by Knox and Guiochon extending into the 1990s we continue to see statements that flatly contradict theory. A prominent example is the notion that optimum "performance", as measured by plate count, is always obtained by operating conventional length columns (e.g., 5-15 cm) at eluent velocities corresponding to the minimum plate height in the van Deemter curve. In the past decade the introduction of "Poppe plots" by Poppe and "kinetic plots" by Desmet and others has simplified the selection of "optimum" conditions, but it is evident that many workers are not entirely comfortable with this framework. Here we derive a set of simple, yet accurate, equations that allow rapid calculation of the column length and eluent velocity that will give either the maximum plate count in a given time or a given plate count in the shortest time. Equations are developed for the optimum column length, eluent velocity, and thus plate count for both the cases when particle size is preselected and when particle size is optimized along with eluent velocity and column length. Although both of these situations have been previously considered the implications of the resulting equations have not been previously made explicit. Lack of full understanding of the consequences of the differences between these two cases is very important and responsible for many erroneous conclusions. The simple closed-form equations that result from this work complement the graphical, iterative approaches of Poppe and Desmet; the resulting compact framework allows practitioners to rapidly and effectively find the operating parameters needed to achieve a specific separation goal in the shortest time and to compare emerging technologies (e.g., high pressure, high temperature, and different particle types) in terms of their impact on achievable plate counts and speeds in HPLC. A Web-based calculator based on the equations presented here is now available (http://homepages.gac.edu/ approximately dstoll/calculators/optimize.html).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19505090      PMCID: PMC3195503          DOI: 10.1021/ac9001244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  19 in total

1.  High-speed liquid chromatography by simultaneous optimization of temperature and eluent composition.

Authors:  Jonathan D Thompson; Peter W Carr
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Monolithic silica columns for high-efficiency chromatographic separations.

Authors:  Nobuo Tanak; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Norio Ishizuka; Hiroyoshi Minakuchi; Kazuki Nakanishi; Ken Hosoya; Tohru Ikegami
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Performance limits of monolithic and packed capillary columns in high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Eeltink; Gert Desmet; Gabriel Vivó-Truyols; Gerard P Rozing; Peter J Schoenmakers; Wim Th Kok
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Geometry-independent plate height representation methods for the direct comparison of the kinetic performance of LC supports with a different size or morphology.

Authors:  Gert Desmet; David Clicq; Piotr Gzil
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  High efficiency liquid chromatography on conventional columns and instrumentation by using temperature as a variable. Kinetic plots and experimental verification.

Authors:  François Lestremau; André de Villiers; Frédéric Lynen; Andrew Cooper; Roman Szucs; Pat Sandra
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Method to predict and compare the influence of the particle size on the isocratic peak capacity of high-performance liquid chromatography columns.

Authors:  Deirdre Cabooter; André de Villiers; David Clicq; Roman Szucs; Pat Sandra; Gert Desmet
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  The application of small porous particles, high temperatures, and high pressures to generate very high resolution LC and LC/MS separations.

Authors:  Robert Plumb; Jeff R Mazzeo; Eric S Grumbach; Paul Rainville; Michael Jones; Tom Wheat; Uwe D Neue; Brian Smith; Kelly A Johnson
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  Effect of first-dimension undersampling on effective peak capacity in comprehensive two-dimensional separations.

Authors:  Joe M Davis; Dwight R Stoll; Peter W Carr
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Critical comparison of performances of superficially porous particles and sub-2 microm particles under optimized ultra-high pressure conditions.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xiaoli Wang; Partha Mukherjee; Patrik Petersson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Advantages of application of UPLC in pharmaceutical analysis.

Authors:  Lucie Nováková; Ludmila Matysová; Petr Solich
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 6.057

View more
  10 in total

1.  Optimization for speed and sensitivity in capillary high performance liquid chromatography. The importance of column diameter in online monitoring of serotonin by microdialysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yansheng Liu; Andrea Jaquins-Gerstl; Zhan Shu; Adrian C Michael; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  The impact of sampling time on peak capacity and analysis speed in on-line comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Lawrence W Potts; Dwight R Stoll; Xiaoping Li; Peter W Carr
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 3.  Perspectives on recent advances in the speed of high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Peter W Carr; Dwight R Stoll; Xiaoli Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Graphical Method for Choosing Optimized Conditions Given a Pump Pressure and a Particle Diameter in Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Stephen R Groskreutz; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Plate heights below 50 nm for protein electrochromatography using silica colloidal crystals.

Authors:  Bingchuan Wei; Douglas S Malkin; Mary J Wirth
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Capillary ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with elevated temperature for sub-one minute separations of basal serotonin in submicroliter brain microdialysate samples.

Authors:  Yansheng Liu; Jing Zhang; Xiaomi Xu; Moe K Zhao; Anne M Andrews; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Teaching with simulation tools to introduce the basics of analytical chemistry instrumentation.

Authors:  Eric Largy; Bruno Alies; Guillaume Condesse; Alexandra Gaubert; Thomas Livingston; Karen Gaudin
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 8.  Are We Approaching a Speed Limit for the Chromatographic Separation of Enantiomers?

Authors:  Christopher J Welch
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 14.553

Review 9.  Optimizing separations in online comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Bob W J Pirok; Andrea F G Gargano; Peter J Schoenmakers
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  High temporal resolution delayed analysis of clinical microdialysate streams.

Authors:  S A N Gowers; K Hamaoui; P Cunnea; S Anastasova; V F Curto; P Vadgama; G-Z Yang; V Papalois; E M Drakakis; C Fotopoulou; S G Weber; M G Boutelle
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.616

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.