Literature DB >> 19502153

Cost-effectiveness of biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the perspective of the Swiss healthcare system.

Roger-Axel GREINER1, Lasse R Braathen.   

Abstract

Treatment with biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis has been approved in Switzerland (2004). However, compulsory basic health insurance limits treatment in non-responders after 12 weeks; responders can continue. The study objective was to evaluate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) due to this regulation. Response was defined as achieving PASI 50, 75, or 90. Placebo-adjusted responder rates were gathered from randomized, controlled trials (weeks 12, 24). Total treatment costs were assessed according to Swiss prices and tariffs. Regimens investigated were infliximab (5 mg/kg IV), etanercept (50 mg SC twice weekly [tw] for 12 weeks, then 25 mg SC tw), adalimumab (80 mg SC week 0, then 40 mg every other week), efalizumab (1 mg/kg/week SC), and alefacept (15 mg/week IM, 12 weeks). Cost effectiveness was calculated as ICER per PASI 50, 75, and 90 responder. Treatment with infliximab led to the highest response rates. Infliximab demonstrated lowest ICER per PASI 90 responder of CHF 22,995 at 12 weeks. Modeling treatment changes at 12 weeks over 36-weeks-horizon resulted in lowest ICER per PASI 75 responder for adalimumab and infliximab compared to the other biologics. Hence in Switzerland, selecting the initial biologic with a high response rate evidenced best value for money.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19502153     DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2009.0725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Dermatol        ISSN: 1167-1122            Impact factor:   3.328


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for psoriasis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nazrul Islam; Canice Ma; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Safety and tolerability of adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a review summarizing 15 years of real-life experience.

Authors:  Paul Sator
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Efficacy and cost-efficacy of biologic therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis: a meta-analysis and cost-efficacy analysis using the intention-to-treat principle.

Authors:  Ching-Chi Chi; Shu-Hui Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etanercept and Adalimumab for Plaque Psoriasis not Associated with Arthritis.

Authors:  Juan Ruano; Beatriz Isla-Tejera; Rafael Jiménez-Puya; Ana Rodriguez-Martin; Manuel Cárdenas; Francisco Gómez; A Antonio Vélez; José R Del Prado-Llergo; José C Moreno-Giménez
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2013-07-06

Review 5.  Biologicals and small molecules in psoriasis: A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Christian Kromer; Daniel Celis; Diana Sonntag; Wiebke K Peitsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Treatment sequencing after failure of the first biologic in cost-effectiveness models of psoriasis: a systematic review of published models and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Josephine Mauskopf; Miny Samuel; Doreen McBride; Usha G Mallya; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.