Literature DB >> 19501894

Histologic follow-up results in 662 patients with Pap test findings of atypical glandular cells: results from a large academic womens hospital laboratory employing sensitive screening methods.

Chengquan Zhao1, Anca Florea, Agnieszka Onisko, R Marshall Austin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Atypical glandular cell (AGC) Pap interpretations and screening for glandular neoplasias remain major challenges. We document the largest reported AGC histopathologic follow-up experience and include verification bias-adjusted data on laboratory screening sensitivity.
METHODS: AGC Pap tests of endocervical origin (AGC-EC), endometrial origin (AGC-EM), and not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS) were documented at a center serving an older low risk population. 98% of Pap tests were liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens screened using computer-assisted screening. Follow-up diagnoses were correlated with cytology and stratified into age groups. Screening sensitivity was assessed by examining Pap results during 1 year preceding neoplastic diagnoses. Verification bias was adjusted with findings in over 2000 patients with hysterectomies.
RESULTS: Of 247,131 Pap tests, 1021 (0.41%) reported AGC results and 662 cases had tissue follow-up. Precancerous or malignant neoplastic histologic outcomes were documented in 101 patients (15.3%), including 8.3% cervical, 6.3% endometrial, and 0.6% ovarian. AGC results were most often associated with neoplastic cervical outcomes in women younger than 40 and with neoplastic endometrial outcomes in women 50 or older. AGC-NOS with a squamous cell abnormality and AGC-EC results suggested cervical neoplasia, while AGC-EM results suggested endometrial neoplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: AGC Pap results detected significant numbers of cervical and non-cervical neoplasias. Since 38 of 44 (86%) of AGC-detected carcinomas were endometrial or ovarian, HPV co-testing would not have aided screening in detecting the majority of malignancies diagnosed after AGC Pap results. Verification bias-adjusted Pap screening sensitivity in the laboratory for detection of significant neoplastic cervical disease was 93%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501894     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology].

Authors:  H Ikenberg
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Point-Counterpoint: Cervical Cancer Screening Should Be Done by Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing with Genotyping and Reflex Cytology for Women over the Age of 25 Years.

Authors:  Mark H Stoler; R Marshall Austin; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Cervical premalignant lesions and their management.

Authors:  Faruk M Köse; Murat M Naki
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-06-01

4.  Evaluation of liquid from the Papanicolaou test and other liquid biopsies for the detection of endometrial and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Christopher Douville; Joshua D Cohen; Ting-Tai Yen; Isaac Kinde; Karin Sundfelt; Susanne K Kjær; Ralph H Hruban; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang; Robert J Kurman; Simeon Springer; Janine Ptak; Maria Popoli; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Lisa Dobbyn; Edward J Tanner; Ana Angarita; Maria Lycke; Kirsten Jochumsen; Bahman Afsari; Ludmila Danilova; Douglas A Levine; Kris Jardon; Xing Zeng; Jocelyne Arseneau; Lili Fu; Luis A Diaz; Rachel Karchin; Cristian Tomasetti; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Amanda N Fader; Lucy Gilbert; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Molecular Classification and Emerging Targeted Therapy in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Ting-Tai Yen; Tian-Li Wang; Amanda N Fader; Ie-Ming Shih; Stéphanie Gaillard
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Triage of Atypical Glandular Cell by SOX1 and POU4F3 Methylation: A Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG) Study.

Authors:  Cheng-Chang Chang; Yu-Che Ou; Kung-Liahng Wang; Ting-Chang Chang; Ya-Min Cheng; Chi-Hau Chen; Tang-Yuan Chu; Shih-Tien Hsu; Wen-Shiung Liou; Yin-Yi Chang; Hua-Hsi Wu; Tze-Ho Chen; Hung-Cheng Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Is 58% sensitivity for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 and invasive cervical cancer optimal for cervical screening?

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Atypical endometrial cells and atypical glandular cells favor endometrial origin in Papanicolaou cervicovaginal tests: Correlation with histologic follow-up and abnormal clinical presentations.

Authors:  Longwen Chen; Christine N Booth; Julie A Shorie; Jennifer A Brainard; Matthew A Zarka
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.091

9.  Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells in the Bethesda system 2001: a comparison with the histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected specimens.

Authors:  Tadahiro Shoji; Eriko Takatori; Satoshi Takeuchi; Akira Yoshizaki; Noriyuki Uesugi; Tamotsu Sugai; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  Management of borderline change in endocervical cells: a more dependable approach.

Authors:  S Kodiathodi; S Chattopadhyay; A Baldwin; P Franks
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.