Literature DB >> 19501893

Population-based study of perioperative mortality after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

Umberto Capitanio1, Claudio Jeldres, Paul Perrotte, Hendrik Isbarn, Maxime Crépel, Vincent Cloutier, Sara Baillargeon-Gagne, Shahrokh F Shariat, Alain Duclos, Philippe Arjane, Hugues Widmer, Fred Saad, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) perioperative mortality (PM) rates reported from a center of excellence (Indiana University: 0% for primary and 0.8% for postchemotherapy RPLND) are applicable to institutions at large.
METHODS: We used the data from 882 assessable patients with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumor treated with RPLND from 1988 to 1997 accessed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. These data did not include data from Indiana University. The observed PM rates were stratified according to age and SEER stage.
RESULTS: The median age at RPLND was 29 years. Of the 882 cases, 435 (49.3%) were performed for localized (Stage I), 380 (43.1%) for regional (Stage II), and 67 (7.6%) for metastatic (Stage III) SEER stage. Of the 882 patients, 7 patients died during the initial 90 days after RPLND, for a 0.8% PM rate. PM increased with increasing age: < or =29 years, 0.0%; 30-39 years, 1.3%; and > or =40 years, 2.7% (chi(2) trend test, P = .002). PM also increased with increasing stage: 0.0% for localized, 0.8% for regional, and 6.0% for metastatic disease (chi(2) trend test, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: RPLND is associated with virtually no or low PM in patients with localized and regional disease. The PM rates for these 2 groups replicated those of Indiana University. In contrast, the PM rate of 6% for patients with distant metastases implies that RPLND for these higher risk patients should ideally be performed at centers of excellence, with the intent of reducing the PM rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501893     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

Review 1.  [What is new in 2011 regarding testicular cancer].

Authors:  S Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Surgical resection of urological tumor metastases following medical treatment.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Wilop; Michael Pinkawa; Daniel Porres; David Pfister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [When is surgical resection of metastases in testicular germ cell tumors indicated and is there a scientific basis?]

Authors:  A Heidenreich; P Paffenholz; F Haidl; D Pfister
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Limits of surgery in uro-oncology].

Authors:  A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Laparoscopic and open postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with advanced testicular cancer--a single center analysis.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Ahmed Magheli; Barbara Erber; Frank Friedersdorff; Ivan Hoffmann; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Steffen Weikert; Kurt Miller; Mark Schrader; Stefan Hinz
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Radical resection of a late-relapsed testicular germ cell tumour: hepatectomy, cavotomy, and thrombectomy.

Authors:  C Ní Leidhin; C E Redmond; A M Cahalane; H M Heneghan; R Motyer; E R Ryan; E Hoti
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2014-12-21

7.  Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer.

Authors:  J Beyer; P Albers; R Altena; J Aparicio; C Bokemeyer; J Busch; R Cathomas; E Cavallin-Stahl; N W Clarke; J Claßen; G Cohn-Cedermark; A A Dahl; G Daugaard; U De Giorgi; M De Santis; M De Wit; R De Wit; K P Dieckmann; M Fenner; K Fizazi; A Flechon; S D Fossa; J R Germá Lluch; J A Gietema; S Gillessen; A Giwercman; J T Hartmann; A Heidenreich; M Hentrich; F Honecker; A Horwich; R A Huddart; S Kliesch; C Kollmannsberger; S Krege; M P Laguna; L H J Looijenga; A Lorch; J P Lotz; F Mayer; A Necchi; N Nicolai; J Nuver; K Oechsle; J Oldenburg; J W Oosterhuis; T Powles; E Rajpert-De Meyts; O Rick; G Rosti; R Salvioni; M Schrader; S Schweyer; F Sedlmayer; A Sohaib; R Souchon; T Tandstad; C Winter; C Wittekind
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Inferior vena cava prosthetic replacement in a patient with horseshoe kidney and metastatic testicular tumor: technical considerations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Pietro Rispoli; Paolo Destefanis; Paolo Garneri; Gianfranco Varetto; Beatrice Lillaz; Claudio Castagno; Patrizia Lista; Libero Ciuffreda; Dario Fontana
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Major complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary cohort of patients with testicular cancer and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian Guido Ruf; Simon Krampe; Cord Matthies; Petra Anheuser; Tim Nestler; Jörg Simon; Hendrik Isbarn; Klaus Peter Dieckmann
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.