Literature DB >> 19501587

Secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy: an open-label randomized controlled trial of lactulose versus placebo.

Barjesh Chander Sharma1, Praveen Sharma, Amit Agrawal, Shiv Kumar Sarin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is associated with a poor prognosis. Lactulose is used for the treatment of HE. There is no study on the prevention of recurrence of HE using lactulose.
METHODS: Consecutive cirrhotic patients who recovered from HE were randomized to receive lactulose (HE-L group) or placebo (HE-NL group). All patients were assessed by psychometry (number connection test [NCT-A and B], figure connection test if illiterate [FCT-A and B], digit symbol test [DST], and object assembly test [OAT]), critical flicker frequency test, and blood ammonia at inclusion. Primary end point was development of overt HE.
RESULTS: Of 300 patients with HE who recovered, 140 (46.6%) met the inclusion criteria and were included. There was a high prevalence of abnormal psychometry test results (NCT-A, 67.5%; NCT-B, 62.5%; DST, 70%; and OAT, 80%), and FCT-A and B were abnormal in 10 of 14 patients. Critical flicker frequency was <38 Hz in 77 patients (55%). Twelve (19.6%) of 61 patients in the HE-L group and 30 (46.8%) of 64 in the HE-NL group (P = .001) developed HE over a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 1-20 months). Readmission rate due to causes other than HE (HE-L vs HE-NL, 9:6; P = NS) and deaths (HE-L vs HE-NL, 5:11; P = .18) in 2 groups were similar. Recurrence of overt HE was significantly associated with 2 or more abnormal psychometric tests after the recovery of an episode of HE (r = 0.369, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Lactulose is effective for prevention of recurrence of HE in patients with cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501587     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  74 in total

Review 1.  Integration of palliative care in end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jamie Potosek; Michael Curry; Mary Buss; Eva Chittenden
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 2.  Functional analysis of colonic bacterial metabolism: relevant to health?

Authors:  Henrike M Hamer; Vicky De Preter; Karen Windey; Kristin Verbeke
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Changing face of hepatic encephalopathy: role of inflammation and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Amit S Seyan; Robin D Hughes; Debbie L Shawcross
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Inflammation: A novel target of current therapies for hepatic encephalopathy in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Ming Luo; Jian-Yang Guo; Wu-Kui Cao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Hepatology in India and INASL: A Ringside View.

Authors:  Anil C Anand
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2012-09-21

Review 6.  Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy Not Responsive to First-Line Treatments.

Authors:  Silvia Nardelli; Lorenzo Ridola; Stefania Gioia; Oliviero Riggio
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06

Review 7.  Management of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Praveen Sharma; Barjesh C Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-10

Review 8.  Current and future diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Jasmohan S Bajaj
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 9.  Disaccharides in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Praveen Sharma; Barjesh Chander Sharma
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.584

10.  Management of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.