Literature DB >> 19501559

Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.

B C Brown1, T P Moss, D A McGrouther, A Bayat.   

Abstract

Greater objective scar severity and visibility should intuitively cause greater psychosocial distress for patients. Previous research is contradictory and has employed non-validated scar severity measures whilst neglecting patient-rated severity. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of objective and patient-rated scar severity, scar type and location on psychosocial distress. Skin scars were quantitatively assessed on two independent occasions using the 'Manchester Scar Scale' (MSS) - a validated measure. Scars were scored twice independently. Patients also rated their scars (from 'very good' [zero] to 'poor' [four]) and good completed the Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS24) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Eighty-two patients, with an average+/-SD (range) age of 34+/-15 (16-65) years were recruited. Mean psychosocial questionnaire scores were: DAS24 45.5+/-17.8 (15-91); DLQI 7.5+/-6.7 (0-26). Participants had 1.9+/-1.5 (1-8) scars with an MSS score of 31.3+/-24.0 (6.6-162.0) and subjective score of 2.6+/-1.2 (0-4). Correlation between psychosocial distress and objective severity was not significant (DAS24 0.14 p=0.11; DLQI 0.16 p=0.06). Correlation between psychosocial distress and subjective severity was significant (DAS24 0.48 p<0.0001; DLQI 0.46 p<0.0001). Patients with non-visible scars experienced greater psychosocial distress than patients with visible scars (DAS24 9.7 p=0.046; DLQI 4.2 p=0.014). Scar type was unrelated to psychosocial distress. Patient-rated scar severity and scar visibility are correlated with psychosocial distress rather than clinician's objective severity rating or scar type. Although counter-intuitive, results are consistent with research into other disfiguring conditions and patient self-assessment should therefore form an integral part of clinical assessment. Copyright 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501559     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  21 in total

Review 1.  Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars.

Authors:  M Dordea; S R Aspinall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Qualitative study shows disease damage matters to patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.

Authors:  Joslyn S Kirby
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Self-Reported Health Experiences of Children Living with Congenital Heart Defects: Including Patient-Reported Outcomes in a National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rachel Louise Knowles; Valerija Tadic; Ailbhe Hogan; Catherine Bull; Jugnoo Sangeeta Rahi; Carol Dezateux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Statistical analysis of factors affecting re-operative times in paediatric patients with scar deformity after deep second-degree burn injury.

Authors:  Baoguo Chen; Xiaotong Yue; Ruijuan Zhang; Huifeng Song
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Transverse or longitudinal? A survey of volar wrist incision preferences.

Authors:  Benjamin Rui Sheng Siow; Claudia Ren Hwee Tong; Mala Satku; Sreedharan Sechachalam; Chong Jin Yeo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Scarring, disfigurement, and quality of life in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor study.

Authors:  Karen E Kinahan; Lisa K Sharp; Kristy Seidel; Wendy Leisenring; Aarati Didwania; Mario E Lacouture; Marilyn Stovall; Anand Haryani; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The Associations of Gender With Social Participation of Burn Survivors: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Casey T Kraft; Gabriel D Shapiro; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Emily C Dore; James Jeng; Austin F Lee; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Alan Jette; Elizabeth A Armstrong; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.845

8.  Longitudinal monitoring and prediction of long-term outcome of scar stiffness on pediatric patients.

Authors:  Bettina Müller; Edoardo Mazza; Clemens Schiestl; Julia Elrod
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-09-30

9.  Stromal vascular fraction-enriched fat grafting as treatment of adherent scars: study design of a non-randomized early phase trial.

Authors:  Linda Vriend; Joris A van Dongen; Anouk Pijpe; Marianne K Nieuwenhuis; Sandra J M Jongen; Martin C Harmsen; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Berend van der Lei
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.728

10.  A Prospective Controlled Study on Long-Term Outcomes of Facial Lacerations in Children.

Authors:  Sonja Fontana; Clemens M Schiestl; Markus A Landolt; Georg Staubli; Sara von Salis; Kathrin Neuhaus; Christoph Mohr; Julia Elrod
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.