Literature DB >> 19500853

cMET and refractive error progression in children.

Chiea C Khor1, Robert Grignani, Daniel P K Ng, Kai Yee Toh, Kee-Seng Chia, Donald Tan, Denise L M Goh, Seang-Mei Saw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether genetic variation in cMET is associated with refractive error or change in refractive error over time.
DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Discovery set (Set 1: N = 579 children; 403 cases, 176 controls). Confirmatory set (Set 2: N = 547 children; 338 cases, 209 controls).
METHODS: Children in the discovery set were genotyped for a panel of genetic markers within cMET. Markers that were found to be significantly associated with the presence of refractive error or more rapid change in refractive error were then genotyped in the confirmatory set. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of myopia and the rate of change in refractive error over a 3-year follow-up period.
RESULTS: Carriage of the variant cMET +110703 A allele was found to associate with increased susceptibility to myopia. The variant was also found to associate with a faster rate of change in refractive error in both the discovery set and the confirmatory cohort regardless of the initial refractory ability (School 1; chi(2) for trend P = 0.014) (Schools 2 and 3; chi(2) for trend = 5.42, P = 0.020) (combined N = 1126, overall chi(2) for trend = 10.90, P = 9.6 x 10(-4)). Carriage of the variant allele was also found to be significantly overrepresented in children within the fastest changing quartile (Q4: mean change of -3.01 D over 3 years) compared with the slowest (Q1: mean change of -0.28 D over 3 years) (P(Set1) = 0.004, P(Set2) = 0.02, Combined N = 559, P = 3.0 x 10(-4)).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data implicate the involvement of cMET in the pathogenesis of myopia in general, as well as more rapid progression in refractive error regardless of the initial refractory ability. These results underline the importance of eye growth genes in the development of common myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19500853     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of MYOC, ACAN, HGF, and MET as candidate genes for high myopia in a Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Xian Yang; Xiaoqi Liu; Jie Peng; Hong Zheng; Fang Lu; Bo Gong; Guiqiu Zhao; Yan Meng; Hongzai Guan; Meizhen Ning; Zhenglin Yang; Yi Shi
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2014-04-25

Review 2.  Nature and nurture: the complex genetics of myopia and refractive error.

Authors:  R Wojciechowski
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  IMI - Myopia Genetics Report.

Authors:  Milly S Tedja; Annechien E G Haarman; Magda A Meester-Smoor; Jaakko Kaprio; David A Mackey; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Christopher J Hammond; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  AC and AG dinucleotide repeats in the PAX6 P1 promoter are associated with high myopia.

Authors:  Tsz Kin Ng; Ching Yan Lam; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam; Sylvia Wai Yee Chiang; Pancy Oi Sin Tam; Dan Yi Wang; Bao Jian Fan; Gary Hin-Fai Yam; Dorothy Shu Ping Fan; Chi Pui Pang
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  The hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) gene is not associated with refractive error and ocular biometrics in a Caucasian population.

Authors:  M Schache; C Y Chen; M Dirani; P N Baird
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.367

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.