Literature DB >> 19500852

Correction of myopia after cataract surgery with a light-adjustable lens.

Arturo Chayet1, Chris Sandstedt, Shiao Chang, Paul Rhee, Barbara Tsuchiyama, Robert Grubbs, Dan Schwartz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether residual myopia could be corrected postoperatively using the light-adjustable lens (LAL) technology in patients undergoing cataract surgery and LAL implantation.
DESIGN: A prospective clinical study was conducted at Codet Vision Institute in Tijuana, Mexico. The LALs were implanted that would purposely result in myopic errors of up to -1.5 D (diopter). The LAL was treated with a spatial intensity profile delivered by a digital light delivery device to induce a targeted myopic refractive change. Once the desirable myopic correction was achieved, the LAL was treated again to lock-in the lens power. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients were studied.
METHODS: The manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best- or spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), were measured with follow up time of 1 to 9 months to determine the achieved refractive corrections and their stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured UCVA and BCVA, achieved versus targeted refractive outcome, and refractive stability with follow up time of 1 to 9 months.
RESULTS: Of 14 eyes, 13 eyes (92.9%) achieved 0.25 D of the target refraction at 1 day post lock-in with 100% of the eyes achieving the targeted refractive adjustment within 0.5 D or better with up to 9 months postoperative follow-up. All eyes treated show no change in manifest spherical refraction >0.25 D between 1 day post lock-in, and 3, 6, and 9 months postoperative visits. The data demonstrate the stability of the achieved refractive change after the adjustment and lock-in procedures. The mean rate of change was 0.006 D per month, which is 6 times more stable than that of laser corneal refractive procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual myopia errors up to -1.5 D were successfully corrected with precision and significant improvement in UCVA and without compromising BCVA using the LAL technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19500852     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  6 in total

1.  Corrective Techniques and Future Directions for Treatment of Residual Refractive Error Following Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Michael V McCaughey; Luis Santiago-Caban
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  Evaluating the evidence for and against the use of IOLs in infants and young children.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumar; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 3.  Pseudophakic monovision is an important surgical approach to being spectacle-free.

Authors:  Jianhe Xiao; Caihui Jiang; Maonian Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Correlation between contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberration based on pupil diameter after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Takefumi Yamaguchi; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuhiko Ohnuma; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-07

5.  Visual Outcomes of an Enhanced UV Protected Light Adjustable Lens Using a Novel Co-Managed, Open-Access Methodology.

Authors:  David V Folden; Jennifer R Wong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Disruptive Innovation and Refractive IOLs: How the Game Will Change With Adjustable IOLs.

Authors:  David F Chang
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.