OBJECTIVE: To systematically describe changes in pain and functioning in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) awaiting total joint replacement (TJR), and to assess determinants of this change. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Database were searched through June 2008. The reference lists of eligible publications were reviewed. Studies that monitored pain and functioning in patients with hip or knee OA during the waiting list for TJR were analyzed. Data were collected with a pre-specified collection tool. Methodological quality was assessed and a best-evidence analysis was performed to summarize results. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, of which two were of high quality, were included and involved 788 hip and 858 knee patients (mean age 59-72 and main wait 42-399 days). There was strong evidence that pain (in hip and knee OA) and self-reported functioning (in hip OA) do not deteriorate during a <180 days wait. Conflicting evidence was established for the change on self-reported functioning in patients with knee OA waiting <180 days. Moreover, strong evidence was found for an association between the female gender and intensified pain. CONCLUSION: Patients with OA do not experience deterioration in pain or self-reported functional status whilst waiting <180 days for TJR. Changes over a longer waiting period are unclear. To strengthen and complement the present evidence, further high-quality studies are needed, in which preferably also performance-based measures are used.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically describe changes in pain and functioning in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) awaiting total joint replacement (TJR), and to assess determinants of this change. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Database were searched through June 2008. The reference lists of eligible publications were reviewed. Studies that monitored pain and functioning in patients with hip or knee OA during the waiting list for TJR were analyzed. Data were collected with a pre-specified collection tool. Methodological quality was assessed and a best-evidence analysis was performed to summarize results. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, of which two were of high quality, were included and involved 788 hip and 858 knee patients (mean age 59-72 and main wait 42-399 days). There was strong evidence that pain (in hip and knee OA) and self-reported functioning (in hip OA) do not deteriorate during a <180 days wait. Conflicting evidence was established for the change on self-reported functioning in patients with knee OA waiting <180 days. Moreover, strong evidence was found for an association between the female gender and intensified pain. CONCLUSION:Patients with OA do not experience deterioration in pain or self-reported functional status whilst waiting <180 days for TJR. Changes over a longer waiting period are unclear. To strengthen and complement the present evidence, further high-quality studies are needed, in which preferably also performance-based measures are used.
Authors: L Gossec; S Paternotte; J F Maillefert; C Combescure; P G Conaghan; A M Davis; K-P Gunther; G Hawker; M Hochberg; J N Katz; M Kloppenburg; K Lim; L S Lohmander; N N Mahomed; L March; K Pavelka; L Punzi; E M Roos; L Sanchez-Riera; J A Singh; M E Suarez-Almazor; M Dougados Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-10-31 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Thomas J Hoogeboom; Ellen Oosting; Johanna E Vriezekolk; Cindy Veenhof; Petra C Siemonsma; Rob A de Bie; Cornelia H M van den Ende; Nico L U van Meeteren Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Erika O Huber; Ewa M Roos; André Meichtry; Rob A de Bie; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sarah R Kingsbury; Nadia Corp; Fiona E Watt; David T Felson; Terence W O'Neill; Cathy A Holt; Richard K Jones; Philip G Conaghan; Nigel K Arden Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 7.580