Literature DB >> 19500099

Clinical significance of minimal residual disease at day 15 and at the end of therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Rosemary Sutton1, Nicola C Venn, Jonathan Tolisano, Anita Y Bahar, Jodie E Giles, Lesley J Ashton, Lochie Teague, Gemma Rigutto, Keith Waters, Glenn M Marshall, Michelle Haber, Murray D Norris.   

Abstract

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction and consolidation therapy is highly predictive of outcome for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and is used to identify patients at high risk of relapse in several current clinical trials. To evaluate the prognostic significance of MRD at other treatment phases, MRD was measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction on a selected group of 108 patients enrolled on the Australian and New Zealand Children's Cancer Study Group Study VII including 36 patients with a bone marrow or central nervous system relapse and 72 matched patients in first remission. MRD was prognostic of outcome at all five treatment phases tested: at day 15 (MRD > or = 5 x 10(-2), log rank P < 0.0001), day 35 (> or =1 x 10(-2), P = 0.0001), 4 months (> or =5 x 10(-4), P < 0.0001), 12 months (MRD > or = 1 x 10(-4), P = 0.006) and 24 months (MRD > or = 1 x 10(-4), P < 0.0001). Day 15 was the best early MRD time-point to differentiate between patients with high, intermediate and low risk of relapse. MRD testing at 12 and particularly at 24 months, detected molecular relapses in some patients up to 6 months before clinical relapse. This raised the question of whether a strategy of late monitoring and salvage therapy will improve outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19500099     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07744.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  22 in total

1.  Minimal residual disease in peripheral blood at day 15 identifies a subgroup of childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with superior prognosis.

Authors:  Jana Volejnikova; Ester Mejstrikova; Tatana Valova; Leona Reznickova; Ladislava Hodonska; Vladimir Mihal; Jaroslav Sterba; Yahia Jabali; Daniela Prochazkova; Bohumir Blazek; Jiri Hak; Zdenka Cerna; Ondrej Hrusak; Jan Stary; Jan Trka; Eva Fronkova
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Treatment of higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young people (CCG-1961), long-term follow-up: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Peter G Steinherz; Nita L Seibel; Harland Sather; Lingyun Ji; Xinxin Xu; Meenakshi Devidas; Paul S Gaynon
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Immunologic minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comparative approach to molecular testing.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Dario Campana
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.

Authors:  Samer K Khaled; Sandra H Thomas; Stephen J Forman
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Clinical utility of sequential minimal residual disease measurements in the context of risk-based therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; Deqing Pei; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Sima Jeha; Cheng Cheng; W Paul Bowman; John T Sandlund; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Hiroto Inaba; Deepa Bhojwani; Tanja A Gruber; Wing H Leung; James R Downing; William E Evans; Mary V Relling; Dario Campana
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Treatment of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Prognostic Factors and Clinical Advances.

Authors:  Lynda M Vrooman; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 8.  Advances and issues in flow cytometric detection of immunophenotypic changes and genomic rearrangements in acute pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Xin Maggie Wang
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-04

9.  Pyrvinium Pamoate Use in a B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Model of the Bone Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Rajesh R Nair; Debbie Piktel; Quincy A Hathaway; Stephanie L Rellick; Patrick Thomas; Pushkar Saralkar; Karen H Martin; Werner J Geldenhuys; John M Hollander; Laura F Gibson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Measurements of treatment response in childhood acute leukemia.

Authors:  Dario Campana; Elaine Coustan-Smith
Journal:  Korean J Hematol       Date:  2012-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.