Literature DB >> 19499402

Improved post-thaw recovery of peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells using a novel intracellular-like cryopreservation solution.

Dominic M Clarke1, David J Yadock, Ian B Nicoud, Aby J Mathew, Shelly Heimfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have become the preferred stem cell source for autologous hematopoietic transplantation. A critical aspect of this treatment modality is cryopreservation of the stem cell products, which permits temporal separation of the PBSC mobilization/collection phase from the subsequent high-dose therapy. While controlled rate-freezing and liquid nitrogen storage have become 'routine' practice in many cell-processing facilities, there is clearly room for improvement as current cryopreservation media formulations still result in significant loss and damage to the stem/progenitor cell populations essential for engraftment, and can also expose the patients to relatively undefined serum components and larger volumes of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) that can contribute to the morbidity and mortality of the transplant therapy.
METHODS: This study compared cryopreservation of PBSC in a novel intracellular-like, fully defined, serum- and protein-free preservation solution, CryoStor (BioLife Solutions Inc.), with a standard formulation used by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Briefly, human PBSC apheresis specimens were collected and 5 x 10(7) cells/1 mL sample vial were prepared for cryopreservation in the following solutions: (a) FHCRC standard, Normosol-R, 5% human serum albumin (HAS) and 10% DMSO; and (b) CryoStor CS10 (final diluted concentration of 5% DMSO). A standard controlled-rate freezing program was employed, and frozen vials were stored in the vapor phase of a liquid nitrogen freezer for a minimum of 1 week. Vials were then thawed and evaluated for total nucleated cell count (TNC), viability, CD34 and granulocytes by flow cytometry, along with colony-forming activity in methylcellulose.
RESULTS: The PBSC samples frozen in CryoStor CS10 yielded significantly improved post-thaw recoveries for total viable CD34(+), colony-forming units (CFU) and granulocytes. Specifically, relative to the FHCRC standard formulation, cryopreservation with CS10 resulted in an average 1.8-fold increased recovery of viable CD34(+) cells (P=0.005), a 1.5-fold increase in CFU-granulocyte-macrophage (GM) numbers (P=0.030) and a 2.3-fold increase in granulocyte recovery (P=0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that use of CryoStor for cryopreservation can yield significantly improved recovery and in vitro functionality of stem/progenitor cells in PBSC products. In addition, it is important to note that these improved recoveries were obtained while not introducing any extra serum or serum-derived proteins, and reducing the final concentration/volume of DMSO by half. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are clearly necessary; however, these findings imply use of CryoStor for cryopreservation could result in improved engraftment for those patients with a lower content of CD34(+) cells in their PBSC collections, along with reducing the requirement for additional apheresis collections and decreasing the risk of adverse infusion reactions associated with higher exposure to DMSO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499402      PMCID: PMC3021966          DOI: 10.1080/14653240902887242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  19 in total

Review 1.  Mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for transplantation.

Authors:  Ramakrishna L Reddy
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.764

2.  The viability of cryopreserved PBPC depends on the DMSO concentration and the concentration of nucleated cells in the graft.

Authors:  K Liseth; J Foss Abrahamsen; S Bjørsvik; K Grøttebø; Ø Bruserud
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Recovery of viable CD34+ cells from cryopreserved hemopoietic progenitor cell products.

Authors:  M Sartor; V Antonenas; F Garvin; M Webb; K F Bradstock
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  David Berz; Elise M McCormack; Eric S Winer; Gerald A Colvin; Peter J Quesenberry
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.047

5.  Overnight storage of autologous stem cell apheresis products before cryopreservation does not adversely impact early or long-term engraftment following transplantation.

Authors:  M D Parkins; N Bahlis; C Brown; L Savoie; A Chaudhry; J A Russell; D A Stewart
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Effective storage of granulocytes collected by centrifugation leukapheresis from donors stimulated with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  Kai Hubel; Elin Rodger; J Milton Gaviria; Thomas H Price; David C Dale; W Conrad Liles
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Novel cryoprotectant significantly improves the post-thaw recovery and quality of HSC from CB.

Authors:  J Stylianou; M Vowels; K Hadfield
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 8.  Improving outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation by immunomodulation of the early post-transplant environment.

Authors:  John Barrett
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 9.  Has allogeneic stem cell cryopreservation been given the 'cold shoulder'? An analysis of the pros and cons of using frozen versus fresh stem cell products in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  N V Frey; H M Lazarus; S C Goldstein
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Transplantation of enriched CD34-positive autologous marrow into breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy: influence of CD34-positive peripheral-blood progenitors and growth factors on engraftment.

Authors:  E J Shpall; R B Jones; S I Bearman; W A Franklin; P G Archer; T Curiel; M Bitter; H N Claman; S M Stemmer; M Purdy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: guidance in developing commercializable autologous/patient-specific cell therapy manufacturing.

Authors:  Shannon Eaker; Myriam Armant; Harvey Brandwein; Scott Burger; Andrew Campbell; Carmine Carpenito; Dominic Clarke; Timothy Fong; Ohad Karnieli; Knut Niss; Wouter Van't Hof; Ravenska Wagey
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Human Wharton's jelly stem cell conditioned medium enhances freeze-thaw survival and expansion of cryopreserved CD34+ cells.

Authors:  Hao Daniel Lin; Ariff Bongso; Kalamegam Gauthaman; Arijit Biswas; Mahesh Choolani; Chui-Yee Fong
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Viable mononuclear cell stability study for implementation in a proficiency testing program: impact of shipment conditions.

Authors:  Olga A Kofanova; Kristine Davis; Barbara Glazer; Yvonne De Souza; Joseph Kessler; Fotini Betsou
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Patient-derived xenograft cryopreservation and reanimation outcomes are dependent on cryoprotectant type.

Authors:  Tommy Ivanics; John R Bergquist; Gang Liu; Michael P Kim; Yaan Kang; Matthew H Katz; Mayrim V Rios Perez; Ryan M Thomas; Jason B Fleming; Mark J Truty
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  The ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 negatively affects the expansion/survival of both fresh and cryopreserved cord blood-derived CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells: Y-27632 negatively affects the expansion/survival of CD34+HSPCs.

Authors:  Clara Bueno; Rosa Montes; Pablo Menendez
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Cryopreservation of Viable Human Tissues: Renewable Resource for Viable Tissue, Cell Lines, and Organoid Development.

Authors:  Andy He; Samantha Powell; Mason Kyle; Michael Rose; Edgar Masmila; Valeria Estrada; Jason K Sicklick; Alfredo Molinolo; Sharmeela Kaushal
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Danish cohort of monozygotic inflammatory bowel disease twins: Clinical characteristics and inflammatory activity.

Authors:  Frederik Trier Moller; Lina Knudsen; Marcus Harbord; Jack Satsangi; Hannah Gordon; Lene Christiansen; Kaare Christensen; Tine Jess; Vibeke Andersen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  High Fidelity Cryopreservation and Recovery of Primary Rodent Cortical Neurons.

Authors:  Sara S Parker; Aubin Moutal; Song Cai; Sambamurthy Chandrasekaran; Mackenzie R Roman; Anita A Koshy; Rajesh Khanna; Konrad E Zinsmaier; Ghassan Mouneimne
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-09-27

9.  Harnessing the Secretome of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Multicell Comparison and Assessment of In Vivo Efficacy.

Authors:  Reaz Vawda; Anna Badner; James Hong; Mirriam Mikhail; Rachel Dragas; Kristiana Xhima; Alejandro Jose; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  Assessment of the Impact of Post-Thaw Stress Pathway Modulation on Cell Recovery following Cryopreservation in a Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Model.

Authors:  John M Baust; Kristi K Snyder; Robert G Van Buskirk; John G Baust
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.