Mario F Mendez1, Jill S Shapira. 1. Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles V.A. Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA. mmendez@UCLA.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a disorder characterised by abnormal social behaviour and potential sociopathy, provides a window to the neurobiology of moral behaviour. This study investigated the basis of altered moral judgements in patients with FTD. METHODS: We administered an inventory of moral knowledge, five "reasoned" moral dilemmas, and five "emotional" moral dilemmas where subjects may cause direct harm to another through their own actions, to 21 patients with FTD compared to 21 comparably mildly impaired patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 21 normal controls. Among the FTD patients, the results were compared to findings on functional neuroimaging. RESULTS: All groups showed retention of knowledge for moral behaviour and the ability to make reasoned moral judgements. In contrast to the other groups, the FTD patients were altered in their ability to make emotional moral judgements. Among the FTD patients, the altered moral judgements corresponded to right hemisphere frontotemporal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: In FTD patients, these findings suggest a decreased emotional responsiveness to others and a tendency to respond to moral dilemmas in a calculated fashion. Such a disturbance may result from ventromedial frontal dysfunction in FTD and supports the presence of a "morality" network in the brain, predominantly in the right hemisphere.
INTRODUCTION: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a disorder characterised by abnormal social behaviour and potential sociopathy, provides a window to the neurobiology of moral behaviour. This study investigated the basis of altered moral judgements in patients with FTD. METHODS: We administered an inventory of moral knowledge, five "reasoned" moral dilemmas, and five "emotional" moral dilemmas where subjects may cause direct harm to another through their own actions, to 21 patients with FTD compared to 21 comparably mildly impaired patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 21 normal controls. Among the FTDpatients, the results were compared to findings on functional neuroimaging. RESULTS: All groups showed retention of knowledge for moral behaviour and the ability to make reasoned moral judgements. In contrast to the other groups, the FTDpatients were altered in their ability to make emotional moral judgements. Among the FTDpatients, the altered moral judgements corresponded to right hemisphere frontotemporal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: In FTDpatients, these findings suggest a decreased emotional responsiveness to others and a tendency to respond to moral dilemmas in a calculated fashion. Such a disturbance may result from ventromedial frontal dysfunction in FTD and supports the presence of a "morality" network in the brain, predominantly in the right hemisphere.
Authors: Eun-Joo Kim; Manu Sidhu; Stephanie E Gaus; Eric J Huang; Patrick R Hof; Bruce L Miller; Stephen J DeArmond; William W Seeley Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Sylvia S Fong; Carlos David Navarrete; Sean E Perfecto; Andrew R Carr; Elvira E Jimenez; Mario F Mendez Journal: Soc Neurosci Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Andrew R Carr; Pongsatorn Paholpak; Madelaine Daianu; Sylvia S Fong; Michelle Mather; Elvira E Jimenez; Paul Thompson; Mario F Mendez Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Josh D Woolley; Baber K Khan; Nikhil K Murthy; Bruce L Miller; Katherine P Rankin Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Winston Chiong; Stephen M Wilson; Mark D'Esposito; Andrew S Kayser; Scott N Grossman; Pardis Poorzand; William W Seeley; Bruce L Miller; Katherine P Rankin Journal: Brain Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 13.501