Literature DB >> 19499221

A phase I/II trial of GW572016 (lapatinib) in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and molecular correlation.

Brian Thiessen1, Clinton Stewart, Ming Tsao, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Paula Schaiquevich, Warren Mason, Jacob Easaw, Karl Belanger, Peter Forsyth, Lynn McIntosh, Elizabeth Eisenhauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We undertook a phase I/II study of the EGFR/erbB2 inhibitor lapatinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to determine response rate, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended dose in patients taking enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and to explore relationships of molecular genetics to outcome.
METHODS: Recurrent GBM patients taking EIAEDs were enrolled on the phase I portion (starting dose of lapatinib 1,000 mg po bid). In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), escalation continued in cohorts of three patients. Patients not on EIAEDs enrolled in the phase II arm (lapatinib 750 mg bid po). Immunohistochemical and quantitative RT PCR studies were performed on tumor to determine PTEN and EGFRvIII status, respectively. Lapatinib PK was analyzed using HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: Phase II: Of 17 patients, 4 had stable disease and 13 progressed. Accrual ceased because of no responses. Phase I: Four patients received 1,000 mg bid and three, 1,500 mg bid. No DLT occurred, but escalation stopped because of lack of phase II efficacy. Lapatinib apparent oral clearance in patients taking EIAEDs was 106.9 L h(-1) m(-2) in comparison to 12.1 L h(-1) m(-2) in those not on EIAEDs. In 16 phase II patients, PTEN loss was seen in 6 and EGFRvIII expression in 4. No correlation was seen with outcome and molecular results.
CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib apparent oral clearance increased by approximately tenfold when given with EIAEDs. In this small sample, EGFRvIII expression and PTEN loss did not predict a favorable subtype. Overall, lapatinib did not show significant activity in GBM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19499221     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  78 in total

Review 1.  Pathway inhibition: emerging molecular targets for treating glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Markus Weiler; Tracy Batchelor; Alfred W K Yung; Michael Platten
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Novel delivery strategies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jiangbing Zhou; Kofi-Buaku Atsina; Benjamin T Himes; Garth W Strohbehn; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Global targeting of subcellular heat shock protein-90 networks for therapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Markus D Siegelin; Janet Plescia; Christopher M Raskett; Candace A Gilbert; Alonzo H Ross; Dario C Altieri
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  CNS Anticancer Drug Discovery and Development Conference White Paper.

Authors:  Victor A Levin; Peter J Tonge; James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle; Arvin C Dar; Antonio Iavarone; Patrick J Paddison; Timothy P Heffron; William F Elmquist; Jean E Lachowicz; Ted W Johnson; Forest M White; Joohee Sul; Quentin R Smith; Wang Shen; Jann N Sarkaria; Ramakrishna Samala; Patrick Y Wen; Donald A Berry; Russell C Petter
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Genomic and Functional Analysis of the E3 Ligase PARK2 in Glioma.

Authors:  De-Chen Lin; Liang Xu; Ye Chen; Haiyan Yan; Masaharu Hazawa; Ngan Doan; Jonathan W Said; Ling-Wen Ding; Li-Zhen Liu; Henry Yang; Shizhu Yu; Michael Kahn; Dong Yin; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Sprouty2 Drives Drug Resistance and Proliferation in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alice M Walsh; Gurpreet S Kapoor; Janine M Buonato; Lijoy K Mathew; Yingtao Bi; Ramana V Davuluri; Maria Martinez-Lage; M Celeste Simon; Donald M O'Rourke; Matthew J Lazzara
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 7.  Glioblastoma cancer stem cells: Biomarker and therapeutic advances.

Authors:  Kelli B Pointer; Paul A Clark; Michael Zorniak; Bahauddeen M Alrfaei; John S Kuo
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Glioblastoma targeted therapy: updated approaches from recent biological insights.

Authors:  M Touat; A Idbaih; M Sanson; K L Ligon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Receptor tyrosine kinase-Ras-PI 3 kinase-Akt signaling network in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Gulten Tuncel; Rasime Kalkan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Targeting cancer stem cell-specific markers and/or associated signaling pathways for overcoming cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Peyman Ranji; Tayyebali Salmani Kesejini; Sara Saeedikhoo; Ali Mohammad Alizadeh
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.