| Literature DB >> 19498950 |
Ming-Hong Tsai, Shu-Cheng Steve Chi, Hsiu-Hua Hu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how salespeople's renqing orientation and self-esteem jointly affect their selling behavior. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Data were obtained from a survey of salespeople from 17 pharmaceutical and consumer-goods companies in Taiwan (n = 216).Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19498950 PMCID: PMC2688612 DOI: 10.1007/s10869-009-9099-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bus Psychol ISSN: 0889-3268
Means, standard deviations, scale reliabilities, and correlations
| Variable | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 1.32 | .47 | – | ||||||||
| Age | 35.21 | 9.50 | −.44 | – | |||||||
| Education | 3.13 | .84 | −.01 | .00 | – | ||||||
| Experience | 8.69 | 7.89 | −.36 | .91 | −.09 | – | |||||
| 3.84 | .55 | −.08 | −.10 | .24 | −.20 | (.81) | |||||
| Self-esteem | 4.51 | .53 | .09 | .15 | .05 | .22 | −.09 | (.83) | |||
| Adaptive selling | 3.47 | .60 | −.25 | .31 | −.07 | .27 | .01 | .32 | .14 | (.88) | |
| Hard work | 3.87 | .62 | −.14 | .34 | −.03 | .33 | .00 | .40 | .40 | .48 | (.71) |
Correlations greater than .13 are significant at the .05 level, two-tailed; those greater than .20 are significant at the .01 level; those greater than .22 are significant at the .001 level; scale reliabilities are on the diagonal
For gender, male = 1, female = 2
Moderated regression models
| Dependent variables | Adaptive selling | Hard work | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | |
| Adjusted | .20 | .22 | .23 | .26 |
| .22 | .02 | .25 | .03 | |
| 9.97 | 9.70 | 11.66 | 11.72 | |
| 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | |
| 216 | 216 | 216 | 216 | |
For gender, male = 1, female = 2
* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001
Fig. 1Interaction effects between renqing orientation and self-esteem on adaptive selling
Fig. 2Interaction effects between renqing orientation and self-esteem on hard work