Literature DB >> 19498844

Theoretical comparison of the sensitivity of molecular contrast optical coherence tomography techniques.

Brian Applegate, Changhuei Yang, Joseph Izatt.   

Abstract

Molecular contrast optical coherence tomography (MCOCT) is an extension of OCT in which contrast resulting from the interaction of light with a contrast agent, leads to the enhanced visualization of a specific morphology or biochemical process in a target specimen. In order to improve the sensitivity and specificity of MCOCT, several spectroscopic techniques have recently been introduced which depend upon coherent detection of scattered light which has been modified by interaction with the molecules of interest in a sample. These techniques include harmonic generation, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, linear absorption, and several different forms of pump-probe spectroscopy. We have developed a theoretical framework to facilitate the comparison of the sensitivity of different MCOCT techniques. This framework is based upon the observation that since the noise floor is defined by the reference field power in a shot-noise limited OCT system, the relevant comparison among the techniques is isolated to the available molecular contrast signal power and the algorithm used to extract the signal. We have derived theoretical expressions for the signal power and signal-to-noise ratio for the MCOCT techniques described in the literature based on molecular spectroscopy, as well as several new techniques introduced here.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 19498844     DOI: 10.1364/opex.13.008146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  8 in total

1.  Molecular Imaging in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Scott P Mattison; Wihan Kim; Jesung Park; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Curr Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-07-01

2.  Stimulated Raman scattering spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Francisco E Robles; Kevin C Zhou; Martin C Fischer; Warren S Warren
Journal:  Optica       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 11.104

3.  Structural correlation between the nerve fiber layer and retinal ganglion cell loss in mice with targeted disruption of the Brn3b gene.

Authors:  Andrew S Camp; Marco Ruggeri; Gustavo C Munguba; Mary L Tapia; Simon W M John; Sanjoy K Bhattacharya; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Multiphoton coherence domain molecular imaging with pump-probe optical coherence microscopy.

Authors:  Qiujie Wan; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.776

5.  Methylene blue-filled biodegradable polymer particles as a contrast agent for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jorge A Palma-Chavez; Wihan Kim; Michael Serafino; Javier A Jo; Phapanin Charoenphol; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  In vivo pump-probe optical coherence tomography imaging in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Oscar Carrasco-Zevallos; Ryan L Shelton; Wihan Kim; Jeremy Pearson; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  Fourier domain Pump-Probe Optical Coherence Tomography imaging of melanin.

Authors:  Desmond Jacob; Ryan L Shelton; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Ultrahigh resolution photoacoustic microscopy via transient absorption.

Authors:  Ryan L Shelton; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.732

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.