Literature DB >> 19497674

Assessing the feasibility of targeted selective treatments for gastrointestinal nematodes in first-season grazing cattle based on mid-season daily weight gains.

Johan Höglund1, David A Morrison, Johannes Charlier, Sten-Olof Dimander, Anna Larsson.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was carried out to assess the possibility of using daily weight gain in first-season grazing cattle (FSG) as a marker for treatment decisions to prevent parasite-induced losses caused by gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes. This is intended as a proof of concept for using targeted selective treatments (TSTs) in the control of veterinary parasites. Historical data were combined from three independent grazing trials in Sweden, each of which was repeated over 2-3 years, in order to investigate the influences of parasites on the performance of FSG cattle subjected to different levels of parasite control. In general, the different trials and years produced congruent results. There was a good positive linear relationship between daily weight gains (Dwgt) registered around housing and those recorded in the middle of the grazing season (r(2)=0.54) but not between early-season Dwgt and housing Dwgt. The latter observation emphasizes that factors other than nematode infection influence the final weight of the cattle. However, significant differences in Dwgt ( approximately 0.2 kg/day) were also observed depending on the nematode-control level achieved. At selected time points, the mean number of trichostrongylid eggs, serum pepsinogen concentration and Ostertagia antibody levels were significantly higher in animals with poor performance. ROC analyses showed that anthelmintic treatment of animals with a Dwgt of <0.75 kg/day by mid-season had a sensitivity of approximately 70% and a specificity of approximately 50%. It thus seems feasible to base a targeted selective treatment for FSG cattle on Dwgt recorded approximately 4-8 weeks after turn-out, provided that it is accepted that some animals will be dewormed without indication. This now needs to be tested in controlled field trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497674     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  5 in total

1.  Control of parasitic infection with ivermectin long-acting injection (IVOMEC® GOLD) and production benefit in first-season grazing cattle facing a high-level larval challenge in Germany.

Authors:  Steffen Rehbein; M Knaus; M Visser; R Rauh; S Yoon
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Endoparasite control practices on Saskatchewan dairy farms.

Authors:  Haley Scott; Murray Jelinski; Chris Luby; Fabienne Uehlinger
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Modelling the consequences of targeted selective treatment strategies on performance and emergence of anthelmintic resistance amongst grazing calves.

Authors:  Zoe Berk; Yan C S M Laurenson; Andrew B Forbes; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Calving season is a stronger determinant of worm burdens in pasture-based beef production than the level of residual larval contamination at turnout.

Authors:  J Höglund; A Hessle; F Dahlström
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  A simulation model to investigate interactions between first season grazing calves and Ostertagia ostertagi.

Authors:  Zoe Berk; Stephen C Bishop; Andrew B Forbes; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.