Literature DB >> 19497375

Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information.

Stéphanie Caharel1, Fang Jiang, Volker Blanz, Bruno Rossion.   

Abstract

The human brain recognizes faces by means of two main diagnostic sources of information: three-dimensional (3D) shape and two-dimensional (2D) surface reflectance. Here we used event-related potentials (ERPs) in a face adaptation paradigm to examine the time-course of processing for these two types of information. With a 3D morphable model, we generated pairs of faces that were either identical, varied in 3D shape only, in 2D surface reflectance only, or in both. Sixteen human observers discriminated individual faces in these 4 types of pairs, in which a first (adapting) face was followed shortly by a second (test) face. Behaviorally, observers were as accurate and as fast for discriminating individual faces based on either 3D shape or 2D surface reflectance alone, but were faster when both sources of information were present. As early as the face-sensitive N170 component (approximately 160 ms following the test face), there was larger amplitude for changes in 3D shape relative to the repetition of the same face, especially over the right occipito-temporal electrodes. However, changes in 2D reflectance between the adapter and target face did not increase the N170 amplitude. At about 250 ms, both 3D shape and 2D reflectance contributed equally, and the largest difference in amplitude compared to the repetition of the same face was found when both 3D shape and 2D reflectance were combined, in line with observers' behavior. These observations indicate that evidence to recognize individual faces accumulate faster in the right hemisphere human visual cortex from diagnostic 3D shape information than from 2D surface reflectance information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497375     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: no special role for surface reflectance processing.

Authors:  Richard Russell; Garga Chatterjee; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Elucidating the Neural Representation and the Processing Dynamics of Face Ensembles.

Authors:  Tyler Roberts; Jonathan S Cant; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Early Visually Evoked Electrophysiological Responses Over the Human Brain (P1, N170) Show Stable Patterns of Face-Sensitivity from 4 years to Adulthood.

Authors:  Dana Kuefner; Adélaïde de Heering; Corentin Jacques; Ernesto Palmero-Soler; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The processing of facial identity and expression is interactive, but dependent on task and experience.

Authors:  Alla Yankouskaya; Glyn W Humphreys; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Effects of Caricaturing in Shape or Color on Familiarity Decisions for Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Socially Important Faces Are Processed Preferentially to Other Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in a Priming Task across a Range of Viewpoints.

Authors:  Helen Keyes; Catherine Zalicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Temporal Contiguity Training Influences Behavioral and Neural Measures of Viewpoint Tolerance.

Authors:  Chayenne Van Meel; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The composite face effect is robust against perceptual misfit.

Authors:  David Kurbel; Bozana Meinhardt-Injac; Malte Persike; Günter Meinhardt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.