OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the usefulness of topical decolonization therapy for reducing the risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection among MRSA-colonized inpatients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: Three hospitals with universal surveillance for MRSA; at their physician's discretion, colonized patients could be treated with a 5-day course of nasal mupirocin calcium 2%, twice daily, plus chlorhexidine gluconate 4% every second day. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MRSA carriers were later retested for colonization (407 subjects; study 1) or followed up for development of MRSA infection (933 subjects; study 2). Multivariable methods were used to determine the impact of decolonization therapy on the risks of sustained colonization (in study 1) and MRSA infection (in study 2). RESULTS: Independent risk factors for sustained colonization included residence in a long-term care facility (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.2]) and a pressure ulcer (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.2-4.4]). Mupirocin at any dose decreased this risk, particularly during the 30-60-day period after therapy; mupirocin resistance increased this risk (OR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.6-10.7]). Over a median follow-up duration of 269 days, 69 (7.4%) of 933 patients developed infection. Independent risk factors for infection were length of stay (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2 per 5 additional days [95% CI, 1.0-1.4]), chronic lung disease (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0-2.8]), and receipt of non-MRSA-active systemic antimicrobial agents (HR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-3.1]). Receipt of mupirocin did not affect the risk of infection, although there was a trend toward delayed infection among patients receiving mupirocin (median time to infection, 50 vs 15.5 days; P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: Mupirocin-based decolonization therapy temporarily reduced the risk of continued colonization but did not decrease the risk of subsequent infection.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the usefulness of topical decolonization therapy for reducing the risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection among MRSA-colonized inpatients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: Three hospitals with universal surveillance for MRSA; at their physician's discretion, colonized patients could be treated with a 5-day course of nasal mupirocin calcium 2%, twice daily, plus chlorhexidine gluconate 4% every second day. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MRSA carriers were later retested for colonization (407 subjects; study 1) or followed up for development of MRSA infection (933 subjects; study 2). Multivariable methods were used to determine the impact of decolonization therapy on the risks of sustained colonization (in study 1) and MRSA infection (in study 2). RESULTS: Independent risk factors for sustained colonization included residence in a long-term care facility (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.2]) and a pressure ulcer (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.2-4.4]). Mupirocin at any dose decreased this risk, particularly during the 30-60-day period after therapy; mupirocin resistance increased this risk (OR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.6-10.7]). Over a median follow-up duration of 269 days, 69 (7.4%) of 933 patients developed infection. Independent risk factors for infection were length of stay (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2 per 5 additional days [95% CI, 1.0-1.4]), chronic lung disease (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0-2.8]), and receipt of non-MRSA-active systemic antimicrobial agents (HR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-3.1]). Receipt of mupirocin did not affect the risk of infection, although there was a trend toward delayed infection among patients receiving mupirocin (median time to infection, 50 vs 15.5 days; P=.06). CONCLUSIONS:Mupirocin-based decolonization therapy temporarily reduced the risk of continued colonization but did not decrease the risk of subsequent infection.
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Ann E Wiringa; Rachel R Bailey; Vishal Goyal; Becky Tsui; G Jonathan Lewis; Robert R Muder; Lee H Harrison; Lee M Harrison Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Mina Pastagia; Chad Euler; Peter Chahales; Judilyn Fuentes-Duculan; James G Krueger; Vincent A Fischetti Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nicholas A Turner; Batu K Sharma-Kuinkel; Stacey A Maskarinec; Emily M Eichenberger; Pratik P Shah; Manuela Carugati; Thomas L Holland; Vance G Fowler Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Courtney A Gidengil; Charlene Gay; Susan S Huang; Richard Platt; Deborah Yokoe; Grace M Lee Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Lance R Peterson; Susan Boehm; Jennifer L Beaumont; Parul A Patel; Donna M Schora; Kari E Peterson; Deborah Burdsall; Carolyn Hines; Maureen Fausone; Ari Robicsek; Becky A Smith Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Marianne S Muhlebach; Sonya L Heltshe; Elena B Popowitch; Melissa B Miller; Valeria Thompson; Margaret Kloster; Thomas Ferkol; Wynton C Hoover; Michael S Schechter; Lisa Saiman Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-06