In this study, we compare the proteasome inhibition capabilities of two anticancer candidates, [Ni(L(IA))(2)] (1) and [Zn(L(IA))(2)] (2), where L(IA-) is the deprotonated form of the ligand 2,4-diiodo-6-(((2-pyridinylmethyl)amino)methyl)phenol. Species 1 contains nickel(II), a considerably inert ion that favors covalency, whereas 2 contains zinc(II), a labile transition metal ion that favors predominantly ionic bonds. We report on the synthesis and characterization of 1 and 2 using various spectroscopic, spectrometric, and structural methods. Furthermore, the pharmacological effects of 1 and 2, along with those of the salts NiCl(2) and ZnCl(2), were evaluated in vitro and in cultured human cancer cells in terms of their proteasome-inhibitory and apoptotic cell-death-inducing capabilities. It is shown that neither NiCl(2) nor 1 have the ability to inhibit the proteasome activity at any sustained levels. However, ZnCl(2) and 2 showed superior inhibitory activity versus the chymotrypsin-like activity of both the 26S proteasome (IC(50) = 5.7 and 4.4 micromol/L, respectively) and the purified 20S proteasome (IC(50) = 16.6 and 11.7 micromol/L, respectively) under cell-free conditions. Additionally, inhibition of proteasomal activity in cultured prostate cancer cells by 2 was associated with higher levels of ubiquitinated proteins and apoptosis. Treatment with either the metal complex or the salt was relatively nontoxic toward human normal cells. These results strengthen the current working hypothesis that fast ligand dissociation is required to generate an [ML(IA)](+) pharmacophore, capable of interaction with the proteasome. This interaction, possibly via N-terminal threonine amino acids present in the active sites, renders the proteasome inactive. Our results present a compelling rationale for 2 along with its gallium(III) and copper(II) congeners to be further investigated as potential anticancer drugs that act as proteasome inhibitiors.
In this study, we compare the proteasome inhibition capabilities of two antin class="Disease">cancer candidates, [Ni(L(IA))(2)] (1) and [Zn(L(IA))(2)] (2), where L(IA-) is the deprotonated form of the ligand 2,4-diiodo-6-(((2-pyridinylmethyl)amino)methyl)phenol. Species 1 contains nickel(II), a considerably inert ion that favors covalency, whereas 2 contains zinc(II), a labile transition metal ion that favors predominantly ionic bonds. We report on the synthesis and characterization of 1 and 2 using various spectroscopic, spectrometric, and structural methods. Furthermore, the pharmacological effects of 1 and 2, along with those of the salts NiCl(2) and ZnCl(2), were evaluated in vitro and in cultured humancancer cells in terms of their proteasome-inhibitory and apoptotic cell-death-inducing capabilities. It is shown that neither NiCl(2) nor 1 have the ability to inhibit the proteasome activity at any sustained levels. However, ZnCl(2) and 2 showed superior inhibitory activity versus the chymotrypsin-like activity of both the 26S proteasome (IC(50) = 5.7 and 4.4 micromol/L, respectively) and the purified 20S proteasome (IC(50) = 16.6 and 11.7 micromol/L, respectively) under cell-free conditions. Additionally, inhibition of proteasomal activity in cultured prostate cancer cells by 2 was associated with higher levels of ubiquitinated proteins and apoptosis. Treatment with either the metal complex or the salt was relatively nontoxic toward human normal cells. These results strengthen the current working hypothesis that fast ligand dissociation is required to generate an [ML(IA)](+) pharmacophore, capable of interaction with the proteasome. This interaction, possibly via N-terminal threonine amino acids present in the active sites, renders the proteasome inactive. Our results present a compelling rationale for 2 along with its gallium(III) and copper(II) congeners to be further investigated as potential anticancer drugs that act as proteasome inhibitiors.
Authors: J Adams; V J Palombella; E A Sausville; J Johnson; A Destree; D D Lazarus; J Maas; C S Pien; S Prakash; P J Elliott Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Michael Frezza; Sarmad Hindo; Di Chen; Andrew Davenport; Sara Schmitt; Dajena Tomco; Q Ping Dou Journal: Curr Pharm Des Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.116
Authors: C Zhao; X Chen; D Zang; X Lan; S Liao; C Yang; P Zhang; J Wu; X Li; N Liu; Y Liao; H Huang; X Shi; L Jiang; X Liu; Z He; Q P Dou; X Wang; J Liu Journal: Oncogene Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 9.867