Literature DB >> 19496119

Changing outcomes and treatment strategies for wire induced coronary perforations in the era of bivalirudin use.

Annapoorna S Kini1, Oana C Rafael, Kunal Sarkar, Sanjay Rajdev, Madhavi Jakkula, Angelica M Mares, Dheeraj Kaplish, Prakash Krishnan, Michael C Kim, Samin K Sharma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical outcomes and treatment strategies of coronary wire perforations (WPs) in the era of heparin use compared to the era of bivalirudin use.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) advances have led to progressive decrease in complications. Therefore, complex coronary lesions such as chronic total occlusions and calcified lesions are being attempted with stiff/hydrophilic wires with resultant higher incidence of coronary WP.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective data analysis of coronary perforation (CP) for the last 4 years with review of coronary angiograms was done and WPs were identified. A simple classification scheme based on angiographic appearance of CP was made: Type I ("myocardial stain," with no frank dye extravasation) and type II ("myocardial fan," with dye extravasation to pericardial cavity or cardiac chambers).
RESULTS: Overall incidence of CP was 0.49% (82/16,859). Of these 50 (61%) were caused by WP; 30 occurred with heparin use (Group A) and 20 with bivalirudin use (Group B). WPs always occurred in type B2/C lesions (100%) and commonly with use of hydrophilic guidewires (70%). Major adverse cardiac events and cardiac tamponade were frequent in group A (50%) and none in group B (0%); P < 0.01. All WP in group B responded to stopping anticoagulation and prolonged balloon inflation, while group A type II perforations frequently required additional interventions (pericardiocentesis, coil embolization).
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac tamponade and major adverse cardiac events from WPs were less frequent with bivalirudin use compared to heparin use. This beneficial effect of bivalirudin may be explained on the basis of its short half-life and reversible thrombin inhibition property. Therefore, bivalirudin may offer a safer alternative for anticoagulation in complex PCI. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19496119     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

1.  Successful management of Ellis type III left anterior descending artery perforation following percutaneous coronary intervention by a covered stent: Successfully resolved the dramatic complication.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Srinivas; Soumya Patra; Rangaraj Ramalingam; Navin Agrawal; Tanveer Syed; Ravindranath K Shankarappa; Cholenahalli Nanjappa Manjunath
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2014-02-18

2.  Intravascular ultrasound evidence of perivascular trauma during routine percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Akiko Maehara; Gary S Mintz; Anh B Bui; Augusto D Pichard; Lowell F Satler; Ron Waksman; William O Suddath; Kenneth M Kent; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Left anterior descending artery perforation treated with graft stenting combining dual catheter and side branch graft stenting techniques.

Authors:  A Ziakas; F Economou; C Feloukidis; K Kiratlidis; I Stiliadis
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Is a metallic microcoil really a permanent embolic agent for the management of distal guidewire-induced coronary artery perforation?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Min-Kyu Kim; Young Jin Kim; Sun Man Park; Kyoung-Ha Park; Young-Jin Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Coronary Perforation Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - A Case Illustration and Review.

Authors:  Ang Chin Yong; Jack Tan Wei Chieh
Journal:  ASEAN Heart J       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Balloon Occlusion Types in the Treatment of Coronary Perforation during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Xiangfei Wang; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Interventional radiology treatments for iatrogenic severe bleeding during percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Piotr Pasecki; Jerzy Narloch; Konrad Tkaczewski; Wojciech Wasek; Piotr Ziecina; Krzysztof Brzozowski
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-24

8.  Looped wire advancement-not always safe! Fat-not so useless! a case series.

Authors:  Atit A Gawalkar; Navreet Singh; Ankush Gupta; Parag Barwad
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-11-01

9.  Multi-Center Experience of Coronary Artery Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Clinical and Angiographic Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes Between 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  Ramazan Gündüz; Bekir Serhat Yıldız; Nurullah Çetin; Su Özgür; Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici; Kamil Tülüce; Selcen Yakar Tülüce; Mehmet Burak Özen; Soner Duman; Özgür Bayturan
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Coronary artery perforation treated with multiple bare metal stent implantation.

Authors:  Murat Baskurt; Kudret Keskin; Osman Fazlıoğulları; Burak Ayça; Muhsin Kalyoncu
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 1.426

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.