Literature DB >> 19495965

Detectability of fifteen aquatic micro/mesocosms.

Hans Sanderson1, Brian Laird, Richard Brain, Christian J Wilson, Keith R Solomon.   

Abstract

Zooplankton abundance and species richness in 15 untreated 12,000 L outdoor microcosms (n = 15) were monitored over the course of 1 year to document the inherent variability and statistical detectability between replicates. Statistical power analysis were applied to derive the statistically minimal detectable difference (MDD) between replicates with default values set at; alpha = 0.1 and beta = 0.2. Copepod abundance and species richness generally demonstrated the best detectability at 0.31 and 0.16, respectively, (n = 15); 0.59 and 0.33 (n = 3). Total zooplankton abundance and species richness had the lowest detectabilities at 0.19 and 0.14, respectively, (n = 15); 0.35 and 0.3 (n = 3). Rotifers, due to their opportunistic and rapid life traits, had the lowest single-species abundance detectabilities at 0.54 (n = 15); 0.8 (n = 3), whereas macroinvertebrate species richness had the lowest detectability at 0.43 (n = 15); 0.7 (n = 3) over 1 year. We recommend a priori calibration of the study design relative to relevant MDDs. Moreover, it is suggested to consider alternatives to statistical null hypothesis testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19495965     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0327-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pesticide studies: replicability of micro/mesocosms.

Authors:  Hans Sanderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

3.  Structural and functional responses of plankton to a mixture of four tetracyclines in aquatic microcosms.

Authors:  Christian J Wilson; Richard A Brain; Hans Sanderson; David J Johnson; Ketut T Bestari; Paul K Sibley; Keith R Solomon
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Long-term variability of zooplankton populations in aquatic mesocosms.

Authors:  Katja Knauer; Susanne Maise; Gaby Thoma; Udo Hommen; Juan Gonzalez-Valero
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Showing similarity of results given by two methods: a commentary.

Authors:  Hannu Rita; Petri Ekholm
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  No-effect concentration as a basis for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  S A Kooijman; J J Bedaux; W Slob
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 7.  Putting the eco in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Variation, replication, and power analysis of Myriophyllum spp. microcosm toxicity data.

Authors:  Mark L Hanson; Hans Sanderson; Keith R Solomon
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.742

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Statistics matter: data aggregation improves identification of community-level effects compared to a commonly used multivariate method.

Authors:  Mikhail A Beketov; Mira Kattwinkel; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Analysing chemical-induced changes in macroinvertebrate communities in aquatic mesocosm experiments: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Eduard Szöcs; Paul J Van den Brink; Laurent Lagadic; Thierry Caquet; Marc Roucaute; Arnaud Auber; Yannick Bayona; Matthias Liess; Peter Ebke; Alessio Ippolito; Cajo J F ter Braak; Theo C M Brock; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Traits and stress: keys to identify community effects of low levels of toxicants in test systems.

Authors:  Matthias Liess; Mikhail Beketov
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  The minimum detectable difference (MDD) and the interpretation of treatment-related effects of pesticides in experimental ecosystems.

Authors:  T C M Brock; M Hammers-Wirtz; U Hommen; T G Preuss; H-T Ratte; I Roessink; T Strauss; P J Van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Better define beta-optimizing MDD (minimum detectable difference) when interpreting treatment-related effects of pesticides in semi-field and field studies.

Authors:  Sabine Duquesne; Urwa Alalouni; Thomas Gräff; Tobias Frische; Silvia Pieper; Sina Egerer; René Gergs; Jörn Wogram
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.