Literature DB >> 19495793

Does lack of routine postnatal examination on maternity unit increase the risk of hospital admission in the first week of life?

Arthur Abelian1, Jim Turner, Jonathan Cusack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to establish whether omitting routine postnatal examination on maternity units increases the risk of hospitalisation in the first week of life of the newborn. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of maternal and baby details and paediatric admission data spanning 12 months in the setting of two maternity units and children's admission unit (CAU) at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK looking at all live-born babies not admitted to neonatal units (n = 7,058). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For babies within first week of life, main outcome measures are: (1) risk of the need to be assessed on CAU and (2) risk of hospitalisation for 48 h.
RESULTS: Babies who had routine postnatal examination on maternity unit (n = 3,631) and babies who had no such examination (n = 3,427) had similar risks of the need to be seen on CAU (3% and 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.057) and of hospitalisation for 48 h (0.82% and 0.67%, respectively; p = 0.22). Babies born to first-time mothers and/or premature were more likely to have postnatal examination on the maternity unit and were at a higher risk of hospitalisation in the first week of life.
CONCLUSIONS: With prudent selection and extended surveillance of at-risk babies, lack of routine postnatal examination on maternity unit did not increase the risks of hospital review or admission in the first week of life. Worryingly, however, as many as 27% of all babies might not have had routine postnatal examination at all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19495793     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-009-1003-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  10 in total

1.  The role of the routine neonatal examination.

Authors:  D M Hall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

2.  Routine neonatal examination: effectiveness of trainee paediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner.

Authors:  T W Lee; R E Skelton; C Skene
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  A randomised controlled trial of maternal satisfaction with the routine examination of the newborn baby at three months post birth.

Authors:  Dieter Wolke; Shreya Davé; Julie Hayes; Joy Townsend; Maggie Tomlin
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs; an evaluation using video recordings.

Authors:  L Bloomfield; C Rogers; J Townsend; D Wolke; E Quist-Therson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 5.  Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of an extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and paediatric senior house officers.

Authors:  J Townsend; D Wolke; J Hayes; S Davé; C Rogers; L Bloomfield; E Quist-Therson; M Tomlin; D Messer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  R Knowles; I Griebsch; C Dezateux; J Brown; C Bull; C Wren
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Early discharge and readmission to hospital in the first month of life in the Northern Region of the UK during 1998: a case cohort study.

Authors:  S J Oddie; D Hammal; S Richmond; L Parker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Neonatal examination and screening trial (NEST): a randomised, controlled, switchback trial of alternative policies for low risk infants.

Authors:  C M Glazener; C R Ramsay; M K Campbell; P Booth; P Duffty; D J Lloyd; A McDonald; J A Reid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

9.  Home-based care after a shortened hospital stay versus hospital-based care postpartum: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou; Michel Boulvain; Judit Simon; Patrice Maricot; François Borst; Thomas Perneger; Olivier Irion
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 10.  The value of the postnatal examination in improving child health.

Authors:  K Green; S Oddie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.747

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.