Literature DB >> 19495536

Commercial pressures and professional ethics: troubling revisions to the recent ACOG Practice Bulletins on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

L Lewis Wall1, Douglas Brown.   

Abstract

Commercial interests are reshaping the practice of gynecological surgery by promoting the use of trochar-and-mesh surgical "kits" for the treatment of stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In this article, we discuss the ethical implications of changes in surgical practice that are driven by commercial interests. We point out the dangers inherent in the adoption of new procedures without adequate and documented evidence to support their safety and efficacy. We discuss the most recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletins on pelvic organ prolapse (numbers 79 and 85) which were altered without explanation to downplay the experimental nature of these commercial products. We suggest that in so doing, ACOG is not meeting its fiduciary responsibilities to patients and is undermining important professional values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19495536     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0864-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  5 in total

Review 1.  Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques?

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Philip A Ludbrook
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 79: Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 85: Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  What does "FDA Approved" mean for medical devices?

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gouri B Diwadkar; Matthew D Barber; Benjamin Feiner; Christopher Maher; J Eric Jelovsek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.661

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Response to Wall and Brown: "Commercial pressures and professional ethics: troubling revisions to the recent ACOG Practice Bulletins on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse".

Authors:  Anne M Weber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-09-25

2.  Comments on Wall and Brown: "Commercial pressures and professional ethics: troubling revisions to the recent ACOG Practice Bulletins on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse".

Authors:  Hal C Lawrence
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-09-25

3.  [Complications associated with plastic meshes and slings. A situation like in the US?].

Authors:  E Petri
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Reasonable people disagree: lessons learned from the sling and mesh story.

Authors:  Bob L Shull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.