Literature DB >> 19493131

Size-dependent predation risk in tree-feeding insects with different colouration strategies: a field experiment.

Triinu Remmel1, Toomas Tammaru.   

Abstract

1. Body size is positively correlated with fecundity in various animals, but the factors that counterbalance the resulting selection pressure towards large size are difficult to establish. Positively size-dependent predation risk has been proposed as a selective factor potentially capable of balancing the fecundity advantage of large size. 2. To construct optimality models of insect body size, realistic estimates of size-dependent predation rates are necessary. Moreover, prey traits such as colouration should be considered, as they may substantially alter the relationship between body size and mortality risk. 3. To quantify mortality patterns, we conducted field experiments in which we exposed cryptic and conspicuous artificial larvae of different sizes to bird predators, and recorded the incidence of bird attacks. 4. The average daily mortality rate was estimated to vary between 4% and 10%. In both cryptic and conspicuous larvae, predation risk increased with prey size, but the increase tended to be steeper in the conspicuous group. No main effect of colour type was found. All the quantitative relationships were reasonably consistent across replicates. 5. Our results suggest that the size dependence of mortality risk in insect prey is primarily determined by the probability of being detected by a predator rather than by a size-dependent warning effect associated with conspicuous colouration. Our results therefore imply that warningly coloured insects do not necessarily benefit more than the cryptic species from large body size, as has been previously suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19493131     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01566.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  16 in total

1.  Counterintuitive size patterns in bivoltine moths: late-season larvae grow larger despite lower food quality.

Authors:  Tiit Teder; Toomas Esperk; Triinu Remmel; Anu Sang; Toomas Tammaru
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Feeding damage to plants increases with plant size across 21 Brassicaceae species.

Authors:  Hella Schlinkert; Catrin Westphal; Yann Clough; Martin Ludwig; Patrick Kabouw; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Body size affects the evolution of eyespots in caterpillars.

Authors:  Thomas John Hossie; John Skelhorn; Jesse W Breinholt; Akito Y Kawahara; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Body size affects the evolution of hidden colour signals in moths.

Authors:  Changku Kang; Reza Zahiri; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Natural selection on body size is mediated by multiple interacting factors: a comparison of beetle populations varying naturally and experimentally in body size.

Authors:  Angela R Amarillo-Suárez; R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Plant Size as Determinant of Species Richness of Herbivores, Natural Enemies and Pollinators across 21 Brassicaceae Species.

Authors:  Hella Schlinkert; Catrin Westphal; Yann Clough; Zoltán László; Martin Ludwig; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Disentangling the phylogenetic and ecological components of spider phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Thiago Gonçalves-Souza; José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; Gustavo Quevedo Romero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contrasting patterns of larval mortality in two sympatric riverine fish species: a test of the critical period hypothesis.

Authors:  Nicole McCasker; Paul Humphries; Shaun Meredith; Nicholas Klomp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.

Authors:  Christina G Halpin; John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Body size but not warning signal luminance influences predation risk in recently metamorphosed poison frogs.

Authors:  Eric E Flores; Martin Stevens; Allen J Moore; Hannah M Rowland; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.