Literature DB >> 19492985

Systematic review of nursing simulation literature for use of learning theory.

Joanna Kaakinen1, Ellyn Arwood.   

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic analysis of nursing simulation literature between 2000 -2007 was to determine how learning theory was used to design and assess learning that occurs in simulations. Out of the 120 articles in which designing nursing simulations was reported, 16 referenced learning or developmental theory as the basis of how and why they set up the simulation. Of the 16 articles that used a learning type of foundation, only two considered learning as a cognitive task. More research is needed that investigates the efficacy of simulation for improving student learning. The study concludes that most nursing faculty approach simulation from a teaching paradigm rather than a learning paradigm. For simulation to foster student learning there must be a fundamental shift from a teaching paradigm to a learning paradigm and a foundational learning theory to design and evaluate simulation should be used. Examples of how to match simulation with learning theory are included.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19492985     DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh        ISSN: 1548-923X


  7 in total

1.  Manikin-based clinical simulation in chiropractic education.

Authors:  Marion McGregor; Dominic Giuliano
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2012

2.  Progressive Assessment and Competency Evaluation Framework for Integrating Simulation in Nurse Practitioner Education.

Authors:  Angela Starkweather; Lana Sargent; Carla Nye; Tara Albrecht; Rachel Cloutier; Ashley Foster
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 0.767

3.  Vicarious audiovisual learning in perfusion education.

Authors:  Thomas E Rath; David W Holt
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-12

4.  The Equivalence of Video Self-review Versus Debriefing After Simulation: Can Faculty Resources Be Reallocated?

Authors:  Gregory J Tudor; Gregory S Podolej; Ann Willemsen-Dunlap; Vivian Lau; Jessica D Svendsen; Jeremy McGarvey; John A Vozenilek; Lisa T Barker
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-08-12

5.  A method for evaluating health care workers' personal protective equipment technique.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Beam; Shawn G Gibbs; Kathleen C Boulter; Marcia E Beckerdite; Philip W Smith
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Comparison of learning outcomes of interprofessional education simulation with traditional single-profession education simulation: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Shu-Yu Kuo; Jen-Chieh Wu; Hui-Wen Chen; John M O'Donnell; Yu-Jui Chiu; Yi-Chun Chen; Yi-No Kang; Yueh-Ting Tuan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  Developing an Innovative Medical Training Simulation Device for Peripheral Venous Access: A User-Centered Design Approach.

Authors:  Constanza Miranda; Fernando Altermatt; Ignacio Villagrán; Julián Goñi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.