Literature DB >> 19492983

Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.

Kwangmi Ahn1, Derek Gordon, Stephen J Finch.   

Abstract

Genotyping error adversely affects the statistical power of case-control association studies and introduces bias in the estimated parameters when the same error mechanism and probabilities apply to both affected and unaffected individuals; that is, when there is non-differential genotype misclassification. Simulation studies have shown that differential genotype misclassification leads to a rejection rate that is higher than the nominal significance level (type I error rate) for some tests of association. This study extends previous work by examining this issue analytically using the non-centrality parameter of the asymptotic distribution of the chi-squared test and linear trend test (LTT) when there is no difference between case and control genotype frequencies, but there is differential misclassification with SNP data. The parameters examined are the minor allele frequency (MAF) and sample size. When MAF is less than 0.2, differential genotyping errors lead to a rejection rate much larger than the nominal significance level. As the MAF decreases to zero, the increase in the rejection rate becomes larger. The errors that most increase the rejection rate are differential recording of the more common homozygote as the other homozygote and differential recording of the more common homozygote as the heterozygote. The rejection rate increases as the sample size increases for fixed differential genotyping error rates and nominal significance level for each test.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19492983     DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  9 in total

1.  Associations of ATGL gene polymorphisms with chicken growth and fat traits.

Authors:  Q-H Nie; M-X Fang; L Xie; X Shen; J Liu; Z-P Luo; J-J Shi; X-Q Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.

Authors:  Scott Powers; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Spoiling the whole bunch: quality control aimed at preserving the integrity of high-throughput genotyping.

Authors:  Anna Pluzhnikov; Jennifer E Below; Anuar Konkashbaev; Anna Tikhomirov; Emily Kistner-Griffin; Cheryl A Roe; Dan L Nicolae; Nancy J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Single-variant and multi-variant trend tests for genetic association with next-generation sequencing that are robust to sequencing error.

Authors:  Wonkuk Kim; Douglas Londono; Lisheng Zhou; Jinchuan Xing; Alejandro Q Nato; Anthony Musolf; Tara C Matise; Stephen J Finch; Derek Gordon
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  ETHNOPRED: a novel machine learning method for accurate continental and sub-continental ancestry identification and population stratification correction.

Authors:  Mohsen Hajiloo; Yadav Sapkota; John R Mackey; Paula Robson; Russell Greiner; Sambasivarao Damaraju
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Evaluating the concordance between sequencing, imputation and microarray genotype calls in the GAW18 data.

Authors:  Ally Rogers; Andrew Beck; Nathan L Tintle
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2014-06-17

7.  Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.

Authors:  Morgan Mayer-Jochimsen; Shannon Fast; Nathan L Tintle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Enhancing the power of genetic association studies through the use of silver standard cases derived from electronic medical records.

Authors:  Andrew McDavid; Paul K Crane; Katherine M Newton; David R Crosslin; Wayne McCormick; Noah Weston; Kelly Ehrlich; Eugene Hart; Robert Harrison; Walter A Kukull; Carla Rottscheit; Peggy Peissig; Elisha Stefanski; Catherine A McCarty; Rebecca Lynn Zuvich; Marylyn D Ritchie; Jonathan L Haines; Joshua C Denny; Gerard D Schellenberg; Mariza de Andrade; Iftikhar Kullo; Rongling Li; Daniel Mirel; Andrew Crenshaw; James D Bowen; Ge Li; Debby Tsuang; Susan McCurry; Linda Teri; Eric B Larson; Gail P Jarvik; Chris S Carlson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluating the impact of genotype errors on rare variant tests of association.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Cook; Alejandra Benitez; Casey Fu; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.