AIMS: To use PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure), a visual instrument that has recently been developed and validated to assess suffering in patients with chronic physical illness, in orofacial pain patients and test for associations of PRISM with established assessment tools for pain, affective symptoms, and sleep. Of particular interest was the utility of PRISM as a screening tool for severely suffering patients. METHODS: One hundred and two orofacial pain patients recruited from a specialized outpatient service completed a questionnaire-based survey, including established assessment tools: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), as well as a paper and pencil version of PRISM. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients who submitted the clinical questionnaire, 74 performed the PRISM-test (response rate: 72%). PRISM scores correlated strongly with all subscores of pain (measured by GCPS) and sleep (measured by ISI). Further, a trend was observed in the correlation with affective symptoms measured by the HADS. PRISM could readily detect patients with high, pain-related suffering. CONCLUSION: These data add support to the hypothesis that the PRISM task in its paper and pencil version is measuring the burden of suffering. The clinical utility of this simple graphic tool therefore lies in its potential to alert clinicians to a high burden of suffering and thus it may help to identify orofacial pain patients who may benefit from more comprehensive assessment and treatment. Prospective studies are needed to clarify this claim.
AIMS: To use PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure), a visual instrument that has recently been developed and validated to assess suffering in patients with chronic physical illness, in orofacial painpatients and test for associations of PRISM with established assessment tools for pain, affective symptoms, and sleep. Of particular interest was the utility of PRISM as a screening tool for severely suffering patients. METHODS: One hundred and two orofacial painpatients recruited from a specialized outpatient service completed a questionnaire-based survey, including established assessment tools: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), as well as a paper and pencil version of PRISM. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients who submitted the clinical questionnaire, 74 performed the PRISM-test (response rate: 72%). PRISM scores correlated strongly with all subscores of pain (measured by GCPS) and sleep (measured by ISI). Further, a trend was observed in the correlation with affective symptoms measured by the HADS. PRISM could readily detect patients with high, pain-related suffering. CONCLUSION: These data add support to the hypothesis that the PRISM task in its paper and pencil version is measuring the burden of suffering. The clinical utility of this simple graphic tool therefore lies in its potential to alert clinicians to a high burden of suffering and thus it may help to identify orofacial painpatients who may benefit from more comprehensive assessment and treatment. Prospective studies are needed to clarify this claim.
Authors: Mariann Ring; Gregor Harbauer; Sebastian Haas; Christopher Schuetz; Andreas Andreae; Andreas Maercker; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross Journal: Neuropsychiatr Date: 2014-11-13
Authors: Vicky Lehmann; Simone Oerlemans; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Ad J J M Vingerhoets; Floortje Mols Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-04-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Steffi Weidt; Annette Beatrix Bruehl; Hanspeter Moergeli; Dominik Straumann; Stefan Hegemann; Stefan Büchi; Michael Rufer Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Gerhard Schmalz; Laura Schmidt; Rainer Haak; Stefan Büchi; Szymon Goralski; Andreas Roth; Dirk Ziebolz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Nicole Peter; Tobias Kleinjung; Lukas Horat; Sabine Schmidt-Weitmann; Martin Meyer; Stefan Büchi; Steffi Weidt Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 3.186