Literature DB >> 19491419

Chronology of meiosis & synaptonemal complex abnormalities in normal & abnormal spermatogenesis.

Virginie Tassistro1, Rahma Ghalamoun-Slami, Jacquline Saias-Magnan, Marie-Roberte Guichaoua.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND &
OBJECTIVES: The study was taken up to define criteria of normality for meiosis by assessing the frequency of meiotic prophase cell types, the frequency of pachytene substage in normal and abnormal spermatogenesis and to determine what synaptonemal complex.
METHODS: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the first meiotic prophase was performed in 10 patients presenting with non-obstructive infertility and 10 controls, using dual colour immunocytochemistry with SCP3 and BRCA1 which visualise axial elements and synaptonemal complexes (SC). The respective frequencies of the leptotene, zygotene and pachytene stages as well as the frequencies of the four substages of pachytene were evaluated. The frequencies of the main types of meiotic abnormalities at pachytene were also assessed.
RESULTS: The frequencies of leptotene and zygotene stages were significantly higher in patients (7.95 and 9.75%) than in controls (2.30 and 1.45%), whereas the frequency of pachytene was significantly higher in controls than in patients (96.25 vs. 75.30%). Detailed analysis of the sex chromosomes revealed that the controls showed a presence of late pachytene substages (P3 + P4 = 64.40%), whereas the patients showed a early pachytene substages (P1 + P2 = 63.40%). From these results, a new index was defined to evaluate spermatogenesis: the Pachytene Index, or PI (PI = P1 + P2 / P1 + P2 + P3 + P4). The same abnormalities (asynapsis, fragmented SC, dotted SC, thin SC) were observed in controls and in patients, but with different frequencies. The most frequent abnormality was fragmented SC, with a significant difference between patients and controls (15.28 vs. 9.74%). There was a significant difference between patients and controls for the frequency of asynapsed nuclei (7.97 vs. 2.95%) while the difference in other abnormalities were not significant. INTERPRETATION &
CONCLUSION: The accumulation of early primary spermatocytes is an indication that progression of meiosis is defective in spermatogenesis failures. The value of the PI less than 0.50 indicates that the kinetic of meiosis is normal at pachytene. There is no normal spermatogenesis when the frequency of one or several SC abnormalities is significantly higher than in controls and/ or when the PI is more than 0.50.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19491419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Res        ISSN: 0971-5916            Impact factor:   2.375


  4 in total

1.  Ploidy of spermatogenic cells of men with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome as measured by a computerized cell scanning system.

Authors:  Alisa Komsky-Elbaz; Arieh Raziel; Ido Ben-Ami; Orna Bern; Billa Maslansky; Yariv S Gidoni; Raphael Ron-El; Deborah Strassburger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Deregulation of sertoli and leydig cells function in patients with Klinefelter syndrome as evidenced by testis transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Marco D'Aurora; Alberto Ferlin; Marta Di Nicola; Andrea Garolla; Luca De Toni; Sara Franchi; Giandomenico Palka; Carlo Foresta; Liborio Stuppia; Valentina Gatta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Reticulate Evolution of the Rock Lizards: Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics and Spermatogenesis in Diploid and Triploid Males of the Genus Darevskia.

Authors:  Victor Spangenberg; Marine Arakelyan; Eduard Galoyan; Sergey Matveevsky; Ruzanna Petrosyan; Yuri Bogdanov; Felix Danielyan; Oxana Kolomiets
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Cytogenetic and molecular analyses of de novo translocation dic(9;13)(p11.2;p12) in an infertile male.

Authors:  Ewa Wiland; Marta Olszewska; Andrew Georgiadis; Nataliya Huleyuk; Barbara Panasiuk; Danuta Zastavna; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Piotr Jedrzejczak; Alina T Midro; Alexander N Yatsenko; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.