BACKGROUND: Turning has been associated with instability, falls, and freezing in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different modalities of rhythmic cueing on the duration of a functional turn in freezers and nonfreezers. METHODS: A total of 133 patients with idiopathic PD while in the on phase of the medication cycle participated in this study as part of a subanalysis from the RESCUE trial. The effect of 3 different cue modalities on functional turning performance was investigated, involving a 180 degrees turn while picking up a tray. Time to perform this task was measured using an activity monitor. Tests were performed without cues and with auditory, visual, and somatosensory cues delivered in a randomized order at preferred straight-line stepping frequency. RESULTS: Cueing (all types) increased the speed of the turn in all subjects. There was no difference between turn performance of freezers and nonfreezers in cued and noncued conditions. Auditory cues made turning significantly faster than visual cues (P < .01) but not compared with somatosensory cues, except in nonfreezers. There was a short-term carryover in the final noncued trial. CONCLUSIONS:Rhythmical cueing yielded faster performance of a functional turn in both freezers and nonfreezers. This may be explained by enhancing attentional mechanisms during turning. Although no harmful effects were recorded, the safety of cueing for turning as a therapeutic strategy needs further study.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Turning has been associated with instability, falls, and freezing in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different modalities of rhythmic cueing on the duration of a functional turn in freezers and nonfreezers. METHODS: A total of 133 patients with idiopathic PD while in the on phase of the medication cycle participated in this study as part of a subanalysis from the RESCUE trial. The effect of 3 different cue modalities on functional turning performance was investigated, involving a 180 degrees turn while picking up a tray. Time to perform this task was measured using an activity monitor. Tests were performed without cues and with auditory, visual, and somatosensory cues delivered in a randomized order at preferred straight-line stepping frequency. RESULTS: Cueing (all types) increased the speed of the turn in all subjects. There was no difference between turn performance of freezers and nonfreezers in cued and noncued conditions. Auditory cues made turning significantly faster than visual cues (P < .01) but not compared with somatosensory cues, except in nonfreezers. There was a short-term carryover in the final noncued trial. CONCLUSIONS: Rhythmical cueing yielded faster performance of a functional turn in both freezers and nonfreezers. This may be explained by enhancing attentional mechanisms during turning. Although no harmful effects were recorded, the safety of cueing for turning as a therapeutic strategy needs further study.
Authors: John G Nutt; Bastiaan R Bloem; Nir Giladi; Mark Hallett; Fay B Horak; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Elke Heremans; A Nieuwboer; J Spildooren; J Vandenbossche; N Deroost; E Soetens; E Kerckhofs; S Vercruysse Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Daniel Rodríguez-Martín; Carlos Pérez-López; Albert Samà; Joan Cabestany; Andreu Català Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Paula J McCandless; Brenda J Evans; Jessie Janssen; James Selfe; Andrew Churchill; Jim Richards Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 2.840