Literature DB >> 19490378

Ecological feedbacks and the evolution of resistance.

Meghan A Duffy1, Samantha E Forde.   

Abstract

1. The idea that parasites can affect host diversity is pervasive, and the possibility that parasites can increase host diversity is of particular interest. In this review, we focus on diversity in the resistance of hosts to their parasites, and on the different ways in which parasites can increase or decrease this resistance diversity. 2. Theoretically, parasites can exert many different types of selection on host populations, which each have consequences for host diversity. Specifically, theory predicts that parasites can exert negative frequency-dependent selection (NFDS) and disruptive selection on resistance, both of which increase host diversity, as well as directional selection and stabilizing selection on resistance, both of which decrease host diversity. 3. Despite these theoretical predictions, most biologists think of only NFDS or directional selection for increased resistance in response to parasitism. Here, we present empirical support for all of these types of selection occurring in natural populations. Interestingly, several recent studies demonstrate that there is spatiotemporal variation in the type of selection that occurs (and, therefore, in the effects of parasitism on host diversity). 4. A key question that remains, then, is: What determines the type of parasite-mediated selection that occurs? Theory demonstrates that the answer to this question lies, at least in part, with trade-offs associated with resistance. Specifically, the type of evolution that occurs depends critically on the strength and shape of these trade-offs. This, combined with empirical evidence for a strong effect of environment on the shape and strength of trade-offs, may explain the observed spatiotemporal variation in parasite-mediated selection. 5. We conclude that spatiotemporal variation in parasite-driven evolution is likely to be common, and that this variation may be driven by ecological factors. We suggest that the feedback between ecological and evolutionary dynamics in host-parasite interactions is likely to be a productive area of research. In particular, studies addressing the role of ecological factors (e.g. productivity and predation regimes) in driving the outcome of parasite-mediated selection on host populations are warranted. Such studies are necessary if we are to understand the mechanisms underlying the observed variation in the effects of parasites on host diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19490378     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  10 in total

1.  Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Yan Cai; Suhua Shi; Fugo Takasu; Anders P Møller; Anton Antonov; Frode Fossøy; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Costs of CRISPR-Cas-mediated resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus.

Authors:  Pedro F Vale; Guillaume Lafforgue; Francois Gatchitch; Rozenn Gardan; Sylvain Moineau; Sylvain Gandon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Immune response from a resource allocation perspective.

Authors:  Wendy M Rauw
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Footprints of directional selection in wild Atlantic salmon populations: evidence for parasite-driven evolution?

Authors:  Ksenia J Zueva; Jaakko Lumme; Alexey E Veselov; Matthew P Kent; Sigbjørn Lien; Craig R Primmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Applying evolutionary concepts to wildlife disease ecology and management.

Authors:  Eric Vander Wal; Dany Garant; Sophie Calmé; Colin A Chapman; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Virginie Millien; Sébastien Rioux-Paquette; Fanie Pelletier
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Between-population differences in constitutive and infection-induced gene expression in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Lauren E Fuess; Jesse N Weber; Stijn den Haan; Natalie C Steinel; Kum Chuan Shim; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.622

Review 7.  Immunological Resistance of Pseudosuccinea columella Snails From Cuba to Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda) Infection: What We Know and Where We Go on Comparative Molecular and Mechanistic Immunobiology, Ecology and Evolution.

Authors:  Annia Alba; Antonio A Vázquez; Jorge Sánchez; Benjamin Gourbal
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Resistance of Dickeya solani strain IPO 2222 to lytic bacteriophage ΦD5 results in fitness tradeoffs for the bacterium during infection.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Bartnik; Kinga Lewtak; Marta Fiołka; Paulina Czaplewska; Magdalena Narajczyk; Robert Czajkowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  An offer you cannot refuse: down-regulation of immunity in response to a pathogen's retaliation threat.

Authors:  O Restif
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  A genotypic trade-off between constitutive resistance to viral infection and host growth rate.

Authors:  Lewis J Bartlett; Lena Wilfert; Michael Boots
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 3.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.