Literature DB >> 19489986

The treatment of CIN: what are the risks?

W Prendiville1.   

Abstract

The treatment of CIN: what are the risks?The treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is to remove or destroy the transformation zone (TZ). It is likely that no method of treatment is superior to another if it is performed properly and the limited available evidence supports this view. The significant advantages of excision (simplicity, cost, outpatient procedure, histological examination of the entire TZ) mean that treatment thresholds may have lowered over the last decade. Long-term pregnancy-related morbidity associated with excision has been reported recently. The evidence would suggest that this increase equates to a genuine increase in serious adverse outcome for cone biopsy but not large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). The available data also point to an increase in both incomplete excision and premature labour associated with the excision of large endocervical TZs. The clinical implications arising from this are firstly that women with large type 2 and 3 TZs need appropriate counselling before treatment and that the threshold for treating young women with mild abnormalities needs review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19489986     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2009.00669.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  9 in total

1.  [Colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical cancer].

Authors:  W Kühn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  [Nomenclature of squamous cell precursor lesions of the lower female genital tract : Current aspects].

Authors:  L-C Horn; C E Brambs; R Handzel; G Mehlhorn; D Schmidt; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Outcomes after an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Susan Sotardi; David Daniel; Lydia G Chiu; Anne Van Arsdale; Daryl L Wieland; Jason M Leider; Xiaonan Xue; Howard D Strickler; David J Garry; Gary L Goldberg; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Are treatments for cervical precancerous lesions in less-developed countries safe enough to promote scaling-up of cervical screening programs? A systematic review.

Authors:  Eric Chamot; Sibylle Kristensen; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Yan-Ming Jiang; Chang-Xian Chen; Li Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  ΔNp63 to TAp63 expression ratio as a potential molecular marker for cervical cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Sunyoung Park; Suji Lee; Jungho Kim; Geehyuk Kim; Kwang Hwa Park; Tae Ue Kim; Dawn Chung; Hyeyoung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-term observational approach in women with histological diagnosis of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: an Italian multicentric retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Matteo Serri; Jacopo Di Giuseppe; Carlo Antonio Liverani; Barbara Gardella; Maria Papiccio; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Stefano Morini; Nicolò Clemente; Francesco Sopracordevole
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Absence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in conization specimens from patients with colposcopic biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Retrospective study of 1695 cases.

Authors:  Yulin Guo; Ying Wang; Qiuzi Peng; Lu Li; Miao Zou; Chaonan Wang; Xufeng Wu; Quanfu Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Residual disease and risk factors in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and positive margins after initial conization.

Authors:  Yunfeng Fu; Chen Chen; Suwen Feng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xinyu Wang; Xing Xie; Weiguo Lü
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.